RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

Place in performance ranking	34	63
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	41.18	no data
Architecture	RDNA 3	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Navi 32	AD107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	$649
Current price	$443 (1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3456	2816
Core clock speed	1700 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2544 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	28,100 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	549.5	187.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700 XT 57.60
+24.3%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.35

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7700 XT 22245
+24.3%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17901

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by 24% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	180 +28.6%	140−150 −28.6%
1440p	103 +28.8%	80−85 −28.8%
4K	59 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

230−240
+19.2%

193

−19.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	200−210 +21.2%	165 −21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	220−230 +22.2%	180 −22.2%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +20.2%	180−190 −20.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +19.3%	100−110 −19.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	190−200 +20.3%	158 −20.3%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +19.3%	100−110 −19.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 +22.3%	130−140 −22.3%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +7.9%	278 −7.9%
Hitman 3	130−140 +16.1%	110−120 −16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	450−500 +15.1%	391 −15.1%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +18.5%	130−140 −18.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +19.7%	110−120 −19.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +13.1%	398 −13.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +23%	120−130 −23%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	180−190 +21.6%	148 −21.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	180−190 +20.8%	149 −20.8%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +20.2%	180−190 −20.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +19.3%	100−110 −19.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	160−170 +21.2%	132 −21.2%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +19.3%	100−110 −19.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 +22.3%	130−140 −22.3%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +21.1%	190−200 −21.1%
Hitman 3	130−140 +16.1%	110−120 −16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	290−300 +20.3%	240−250 −20.3%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +18.4%	76 −18.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +19.7%	110−120 −19.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +19.8%	334 −19.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +18.6%	295 −18.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +23%	120−130 −23%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +24%	121 −24%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	160−170 +21.2%	132 −21.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +19.3%	100−110 −19.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	150−160 +23%	122 −23%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +19.3%	100−110 −19.3%
Forza Horizon 4	280−290 +21.2%	231 −21.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +20.4%	216 −20.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +22%	287 −22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	200−210 +19%	168 −19%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +23%	120−130 −23%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

140−150
+19.7%

110−120

−19.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	150−160 +21%	120−130 −21%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +21.2%	130−140 −21.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +22.4%	98 −22.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 +18.8%	101 −18.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +20.9%	90−95 −20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +18.8%	80 −18.8%
Far Cry 5	190−200 +21%	157 −21%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +21.8%	197 −21.8%
Hitman 3	100−105 +23.5%	80−85 −23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +22.8%	171 −22.8%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +19.4%	134 −19.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 +19.2%	193 −19.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +16.7%	120 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +18.6%	55−60 −18.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+22.4%

95−100
−22.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +23.1%	65−70 −23.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +20.4%	50−55 −20.4%
Hitman 3	60−65 +22.4%	45−50 −22.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +22%	80−85 −22%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +21.2%	66 −21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +23.6%	89 −23.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +20.7%	58 −20.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +18.6%	59 −18.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +22%	40−45 −22%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +11.1%	36 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +18.4%	35−40 −18.4%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +19.4%	134 −19.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +16.5%	103 −16.5%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +23.6%	89 −23.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +17.6%	30−35 −17.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75
+22.8%

55−60

−22.8%

This is how RX 7700 XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is 29% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 29% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 XT is 31% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	57.60	46.35
Recency	25 August 2023	12 February 2024
Cost	$449	$649
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	70 Watt