Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX 7600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
43.24
+157%

RX 7600 outperforms T1000 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85327
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation91.97no data
Power efficiency18.0823.20
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 33TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1720 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate339.8no data
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 43.24
+157%
Quadro T1000 16.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16625
+157%
Quadro T1000 6462

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD143
+160%
55−60
−160%
1440p67
+179%
24−27
−179%
4K37
+164%
14−16
−164%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.88no data
1440p4.01no data
4K7.27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 135
+170%
50−55
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 148
+169%
55−60
−169%
Elden Ring 155
+158%
60−65
−158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Counter-Strike 2 108
+170%
40−45
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+181%
21−24
−181%
Forza Horizon 4 284
+158%
110−120
−158%
Metro Exodus 161
+168%
60−65
−168%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
Valorant 170−180
+169%
65−70
−169%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+200%
30−33
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+178%
18−20
−178%
Dota 2 150
+173%
55−60
−173%
Elden Ring 150−160
+180%
55−60
−180%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+189%
35−40
−189%
Fortnite 180−190
+161%
70−75
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 230
+171%
85−90
−171%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+173%
55−60
−173%
Metro Exodus 119
+164%
45−50
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+159%
80−85
−159%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+162%
60−65
−162%
Valorant 170−180
+169%
65−70
−169%
World of Tanks 270−280
+179%
100−105
−179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Counter-Strike 2 81
+170%
30−33
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+181%
16−18
−181%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+189%
35−40
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+165%
75−80
−165%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+159%
80−85
−159%
Valorant 170−180
+169%
65−70
−169%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 77
+185%
27−30
−185%
Elden Ring 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+185%
27−30
−185%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+169%
65−70
−169%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
World of Tanks 270−280
+173%
100−105
−173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+185%
27−30
−185%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+183%
18−20
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+180%
10−11
−180%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+178%
50−55
−178%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+158%
50−55
−158%
Metro Exodus 118
+162%
45−50
−162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+187%
30−33
−187%
Valorant 140−150
+158%
55−60
−158%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 22
+175%
8−9
−175%
Dota 2 82
+173%
30−33
−173%
Elden Ring 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+173%
30−33
−173%
Metro Exodus 38
+171%
14−16
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+160%
55−60
−160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 82
+173%
30−33
−173%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+175%
24−27
−175%
Fortnite 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+188%
24−27
−188%
Valorant 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%

This is how RX 7600 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 160% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 179% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600 is 164% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.24 16.81
Recency 24 May 2023 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 50 Watt

RX 7600 has a 157.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has 230% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2051 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 417 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.