FirePro M4150 vs Radeon RX 7600

Place in performance ranking	80	798
Place by popularity	66	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	38.48	0.35
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Opal
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2023 (1 year ago)	16 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$269	no data
Current price	$352 (1.3x MSRP)	$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 10894% better value for money than FirePro M4150.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	384
Core clock speed	1720 MHz	715 MHz
Boost clock speed	2655 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,300 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	339.8	17.16
Floating-point performance	no data	549.1 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 7600 and FirePro M4150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	204 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 42.28
+1598%

FirePro M4150 2.49

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms FirePro M4150 by 1598% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7600 16328
+1601%

FirePro M4150 960

Radeon RX 7600 outperforms FirePro M4150 by 1601% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	137 +1613%	8−9 −1613%
1440p	68 +1600%	4−5 −1600%
4K	38 +1800%	2−3 −1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2500−2550
+1589%

148

−1589%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1200−1250 +1544%	70−75 −1544%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1200−1250 +1544%	70−75 −1544%
Battlefield 5	2300−2350 +1591%	130−140 −1591%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1400−1450 +1547%	85−90 −1547%
Cyberpunk 2077	1950−2000 +1567%	117 −1567%
Far Cry 5	1500−1550 +1567%	90−95 −1567%
Far Cry New Dawn	1750−1800 +1583%	100−110 −1583%
Forza Horizon 4	2600−2650 +1567%	150−160 −1567%
Hitman 3	1450−1500 +1567%	85−90 −1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5450−5500 +1587%	323 −1587%
Metro Exodus	1950−2000 +1567%	110−120 −1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1650−1700 +1567%	95−100 −1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4800−4850 +1590%	284 −1590%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1700−1750 +1583%	100−110 −1583%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1200−1250 +1544%	70−75 −1544%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1200−1250 +1544%	70−75 −1544%
Battlefield 5	2300−2350 +1591%	130−140 −1591%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1400−1450 +1547%	85−90 −1547%
Cyberpunk 2077	1650−1700 +1550%	100 −1550%
Far Cry 5	1500−1550 +1567%	90−95 −1567%
Far Cry New Dawn	1750−1800 +1583%	100−110 −1583%
Forza Horizon 4	2600−2650 +1567%	150−160 −1567%
Hitman 3	1450−1500 +1567%	85−90 −1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2900−2950 +1586%	170−180 −1586%
Metro Exodus	1300−1350 +1588%	77 −1588%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1650−1700 +1567%	95−100 −1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3900−3950 +1596%	230 −1596%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3550−3600 +1590%	210 −1590%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1700−1750 +1583%	100−110 −1583%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1200−1250 +1544%	70−75 −1544%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1200−1250 +1544%	70−75 −1544%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1400−1450 +1547%	85−90 −1547%
Cyberpunk 2077	1500−1550 +1567%	90 −1567%
Far Cry 5	1500−1550 +1567%	90−95 −1567%
Forza Horizon 4	2600−2650 +1567%	150−160 −1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2900−2950 +1586%	172 −1586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3350−3400 +1583%	199 −1583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2050−2100 +1567%	123 −1567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1700−1750 +1583%	100−110 −1583%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1650−1700

+1567%

95−100
−1567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1350−1400 +1546%	80−85 −1546%
Far Cry New Dawn	1650−1700 +1567%	95−100 −1567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	750−800 +1530%	45−50 −1530%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	750−800 +1496%	45−50 −1496%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1100−1150 +1592%	65−70 −1592%
Cyberpunk 2077	950−1000 +1596%	56 −1596%
Far Cry 5	1950−2000 +1596%	115 −1596%
Forza Horizon 4	1500−1550 +1585%	85−90 −1585%
Hitman 3	950−1000 +1596%	55−60 −1596%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2150−2200 +1593%	127 −1593%
Metro Exodus	2000−2050 +1595%	118 −1595%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2150−2200 +1567%	129 −1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1450−1500 +1586%	86 −1586%
Watch Dogs: Legion	650−700 +1567%	35−40 −1567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1200−1250

+1544%

70−75
−1544%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	700−750 +1528%	40−45 −1528%
Far Cry New Dawn	600−650 +1567%	35−40 −1567%
Hitman 3	550−600 +1471%	35−40 −1471%
Horizon Zero Dawn	900−950 +1536%	55−60 −1536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	700−750 +1567%	42 −1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1000−1050 +1595%	59 −1595%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	450−500 +1452%	27−30 −1452%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	450−500 +1567%	27−30 −1567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	450−500 +1507%	27−30 −1507%
Cyberpunk 2077	400−450 +1567%	24 −1567%
Far Cry 5	400−450 +1500%	24−27 −1500%
Forza Horizon 4	1000−1050 +1595%	55−60 −1595%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1200−1250 +1567%	72 −1567%
Metro Exodus	1050−1100 +1594%	62 −1594%
Watch Dogs: Legion	350−400 +1491%	21−24 −1491%