FirePro D700 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 6900 XT
2020
16 GB GDDR6
69.38
+401%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms FirePro D700 by 401% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking18347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation21.225.10
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 21Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 December 2020 (3 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$957 (1x MSRP)$413

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 316% better value for money than FirePro D700.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202048
Core clock speed1825 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate720.0108.8
Floating-point performanceno data3,482 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz5480 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s263.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD193
+451%
35−40
−451%
1440p134
+458%
24−27
−458%
4K83
+419%
16−18
−419%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+404%
27−30
−404%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 117
+457%
21−24
−457%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 169
+463%
30−33
−463%
Battlefield 5 195
+457%
35−40
−457%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 170−180
+477%
30−33
−477%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+404%
27−30
−404%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+423%
30−33
−423%
Far Cry New Dawn 126
+425%
24−27
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 283
+415%
55−60
−415%
Hitman 3 283
+415%
55−60
−415%
Horizon Zero Dawn 205
+413%
40−45
−413%
Red Dead Redemption 2 196
+460%
35−40
−460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+455%
40−45
−455%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190
+443%
35−40
−443%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 106
+405%
21−24
−405%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 142
+426%
27−30
−426%
Battlefield 5 196
+460%
35−40
−460%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 170−180
+477%
30−33
−477%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+404%
27−30
−404%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+423%
30−33
−423%
Far Cry New Dawn 123
+413%
24−27
−413%
Forza Horizon 4 279
+407%
55−60
−407%
Hitman 3 276
+402%
55−60
−402%
Horizon Zero Dawn 174
+480%
30−33
−480%
Metro Exodus 164
+447%
30−33
−447%
Red Dead Redemption 2 124
+417%
24−27
−417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 207
+418%
40−45
−418%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 323
+438%
60−65
−438%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170
+467%
30−33
−467%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 98
+444%
18−20
−444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 137
+407%
27−30
−407%
Battlefield 5 197
+463%
35−40
−463%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+404%
27−30
−404%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+423%
30−33
−423%
Far Cry New Dawn 118
+462%
21−24
−462%
Forza Horizon 4 248
+451%
45−50
−451%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+447%
30−33
−447%
Watch Dogs: Legion 121
+404%
24−27
−404%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+425%
24−27
−425%
Hitman 3 213
+433%
40−45
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 136
+404%
27−30
−404%
Metro Exodus 102
+467%
18−20
−467%
Red Dead Redemption 2 82
+413%
16−18
−413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 159
+430%
30−33
−430%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 99
+450%
18−20
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
+419%
21−24
−419%
Battlefield 5 196
+460%
35−40
−460%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+429%
14−16
−429%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+458%
24−27
−458%
Far Cry New Dawn 117
+457%
21−24
−457%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+413%
45−50
−413%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+433%
24−27
−433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 91
+406%
18−20
−406%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+457%
14−16
−457%
Hitman 3 128
+433%
24−27
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Metro Exodus 67
+458%
12−14
−458%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
+450%
10−11
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85
+431%
16−18
−431%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 122
+408%
24−27
−408%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
+467%
12−14
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+450%
12−14
−450%
Battlefield 5 134
+458%
24−27
−458%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+413%
16−18
−413%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+461%
18−20
−461%
Forza Horizon 4 162
+440%
30−33
−440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+440%
10−11
−440%

This is how RX 6900 XT and FirePro D700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6900 XT is 451% faster than FirePro D700 in 1080p
  • RX 6900 XT is 458% faster than FirePro D700 in 1440p
  • RX 6900 XT is 419% faster than FirePro D700 in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 69.38 13.84
Recency 8 December 2020 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 274 Watt

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop card while FirePro D700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3396 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 34 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.