Radeon PRO W7600 vs RX 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6800 with Radeon PRO W7600, including specs and performance data.

RX 6800
2020
16 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
52.64
+34.6%

RX 6800 outperforms PRO W7600 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.8837.50
Power efficiency16.0422.92
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 21Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)3 August 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6800 has 17% better value for money than PRO W7600.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402048
Core clock speed1700 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2105 MHz2440 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate505.2312.3
Floating-point processing power16.17 TFLOPSno data
ROPs9664
TMUs240128
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6800 52.64
+34.6%
PRO W7600 39.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 22061
+34.6%
PRO W7600 16393

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD174
+45%
120−130
−45%
1440p102
+36%
75−80
−36%
4K62
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.33
+50%
4.99
−50%
1440p5.68
+40.7%
7.99
−40.7%
4K9.34
+42.5%
13.31
−42.5%
  • RX 6800 has 50% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 has 41% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 has 43% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 350
+34.6%
260−270
−34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 135
+35%
100−105
−35%
God of War 156
+41.8%
110−120
−41.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+42.7%
110−120
−42.7%
Counter-Strike 2 349
+39.6%
250−260
−39.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 115
+35.3%
85−90
−35.3%
Far Cry 5 197
+40.7%
140−150
−40.7%
Fortnite 230−240
+38.2%
170−180
−38.2%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+36.7%
150−160
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 5 232
+36.5%
170−180
−36.5%
God of War 153
+39.1%
110−120
−39.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
Valorant 290−300
+38.6%
210−220
−38.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+42.7%
110−120
−42.7%
Counter-Strike 2 259
+36.3%
190−200
−36.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+39%
200−210
−39%
Cyberpunk 2077 104
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Dota 2 145
+45%
100−105
−45%
Far Cry 5 186
+43.1%
130−140
−43.1%
Fortnite 230−240
+38.2%
170−180
−38.2%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+36.7%
150−160
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 5 210
+40%
150−160
−40%
God of War 138
+38%
100−105
−38%
Grand Theft Auto V 159
+44.5%
110−120
−44.5%
Metro Exodus 147
+47%
100−105
−47%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 269
+41.6%
190−200
−41.6%
Valorant 290−300
+38.6%
210−220
−38.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+42.7%
110−120
−42.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Dota 2 128
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
Far Cry 5 174
+45%
120−130
−45%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+36.7%
150−160
−36.7%
God of War 99
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+38.2%
110−120
−38.2%
Valorant 290−300
+38.6%
210−220
−38.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 230−240
+38.2%
170−180
−38.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 175
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+37.5%
280−290
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+38.9%
90−95
−38.9%
Metro Exodus 89
+36.9%
65−70
−36.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
Valorant 300−350
+37.9%
240−250
−37.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+36.8%
95−100
−36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+48%
50−55
−48%
Far Cry 5 163
+35.8%
120−130
−35.8%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+39.2%
120−130
−39.2%
God of War 82
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+35.3%
85−90
−35.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+35.5%
110−120
−35.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 132
+38.9%
95−100
−38.9%
Metro Exodus 55
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Valorant 300−350
+38.6%
220−230
−38.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Dota 2 102
+36%
75−80
−36%
Far Cry 5 91
+40%
65−70
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+40%
85−90
−40%
God of War 54
+35%
40−45
−35%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+40%
65−70
−40%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%

This is how RX 6800 and PRO W7600 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 is 45% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 is 36% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.64 39.12
Recency 28 October 2020 3 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 130 Watt

RX 6800 has a 34.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2216 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800 or Radeon PRO W7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.