GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G vs Radeon RX 6800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 6800
2020
16 GB GDDR6
57.67
+9.5%

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by a small 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3243
Place by popularitynot in top-10079
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.1538.83
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 21AD106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 November 2020 (3 years ago)18 May 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579 no data
Current price$781 (1.3x MSRP)$424

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti 8G has 75% better value for money than RX 6800.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404352
Core clock speed1815 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate505.2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800 57.67
+9.5%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 52.67

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6800 106236
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 118567
+11.6%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G outperforms Radeon RX 6800 by 12% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6800 55084
+15.2%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 47803

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 15% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6800 45441
+32.7%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 34245

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 33% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6800 205274
+16.2%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 176605

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 16% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 6800 531548
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 795061
+49.6%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G outperforms Radeon RX 6800 by 50% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 214
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 254
+18.7%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G outperforms Radeon RX 6800 by 19% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 232
+144%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 95

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 144% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 171
+1080%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 15

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 1080% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 319
+149%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 128

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 149% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 140
+88.4%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 74

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 88% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 123
+14%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 108

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 14% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 212
+73.4%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 122

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 73% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800 36
+58.1%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 23

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 58% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RX 6800 354
+23.2%
RTX 4060 Ti 8G 287

Radeon RX 6800 outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 23% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD176
+1.7%
173
−1.7%
1440p104
+15.6%
90
−15.6%
4K63
+18.9%
53
−18.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 135
−29.6%
175
+29.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 205
+125%
90−95
−125%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+5.1%
130−140
−5.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+7.7%
140−150
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 115
−19.1%
137
+19.1%
Far Cry 5 197
−2%
201
+2%
Far Cry New Dawn 164
−5.5%
173
+5.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+8.6%
150−160
−8.6%
Hitman 3 180−190
+8.3%
160−170
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 202
+77.2%
110−120
−77.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 245
+10.4%
222
−10.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 115
+23.7%
90−95
−23.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 172
+89%
90−95
−89%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+5.1%
130−140
−5.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 150−160
+7.7%
140−150
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 104
−8.7%
113
+8.7%
Far Cry 5 186
−3.8%
193
+3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 157
−5.7%
166
+5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+8.6%
150−160
−8.6%
Hitman 3 180−190
+8.3%
160−170
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 168
+47.4%
110−120
−47.4%
Metro Exodus 147
+9.7%
134
−9.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 212
+9.8%
193
−9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 269
−3%
277
+3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 104
+11.8%
90−95
−11.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 162
+78%
90−95
−78%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+5.1%
130−140
−5.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
−2%
101
+2%
Far Cry 5 174
−3.4%
180
+3.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 142
−3.5%
147
+3.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+8.6%
150−160
−8.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+7.8%
141
−7.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 88
−5.7%
90−95
+5.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+10.9%
90−95
−10.9%
Hitman 3 120−130
+13.1%
100−110
−13.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+61.3%
80−85
−61.3%
Metro Exodus 89
+12.7%
79
−12.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 137
+13.2%
121
−13.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+8.6%
55−60
−8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 144
+132%
60−65
−132%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+7.8%
100−110
−7.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+23.3%
60
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 163
+21.6%
134
−21.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 138
+8.7%
127
−8.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+11.3%
110−120
−11.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
−3.1%
101
+3.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 72
+38.5%
50−55
−38.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+13.2%
50−55
−13.2%
Hitman 3 65−70
+13.8%
55−60
−13.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35
−37.1%
45−50
+37.1%
Metro Exodus 55
+12.2%
49
−12.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+23.7%
59
−23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
+25.3%
79
−25.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+13.2%
35−40
−13.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 99
+168%
35−40
−168%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+36%
25
−36%
Far Cry 5 91
+35.8%
67
−35.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 99
+41.4%
70
−41.4%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+13%
75−80
−13%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%

This is how RX 6800 and RTX 4060 Ti 8G compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 is 16% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 is 19% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 is 168% faster than the RTX 4060 Ti 8G.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 8G is 37% faster than the RX 6800.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6800 is ahead in 54 tests (79%)
  • RTX 4060 Ti 8G is ahead in 14 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.67 52.67
Recency 18 November 2020 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 160 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6800 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1541 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1429 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.