GeForce MX550 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

RX 6800 XT
2020
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
64.76
+448%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce MX550 by a whopping 448% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking24377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.06no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 21GN18-S5
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 November 2020 (3 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$696 (1.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081024
Core clock speed1825 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2250 MHz1320 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15-25 Watt
Texture fill rate648.042.24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6800 XT and GeForce MX550 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800 XT 64.76
+448%
GeForce MX550 11.82

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce MX550 by 448% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6800 XT 25026
+448%
GeForce MX550 4569

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce MX550 by 448% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6800 XT 52046
+420%
GeForce MX550 10005

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce MX550 by 420% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6800 XT 96516
+164%
GeForce MX550 36560

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce MX550 by 164% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6800 XT 49735
+712%
GeForce MX550 6126

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce MX550 by 712% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6800 XT 193053
+378%
GeForce MX550 40364

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce MX550 by 378% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD199
+352%
44
−352%
1440p142
+492%
24−27
−492%
4K92
+229%
28
−229%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+300%
24−27
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 158
+778%
18−20
−778%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+442%
35−40
−442%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+423%
24−27
−423%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+209%
30−35
−209%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+312%
30−35
−312%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+373%
40−45
−373%
Hitman 3 140−150
+437%
27−30
−437%
Horizon Zero Dawn 432
+1008%
35−40
−1008%
Metro Exodus 144
+311%
35−40
−311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+270%
30−35
−270%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 404
+573%
60
−573%
Watch Dogs: Legion 169
+705%
21−24
−705%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+300%
24−27
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 135
+650%
18−20
−650%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+442%
35−40
−442%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+423%
24−27
−423%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%
Far Cry 5 58
−20.7%
70
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 62
+87.9%
30−35
−87.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+373%
40−45
−373%
Hitman 3 68
+152%
27−30
−152%
Horizon Zero Dawn 387
+892%
35−40
−892%
Metro Exodus 124
+254%
35−40
−254%
Red Dead Redemption 2 121
+267%
30−35
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 275
+958%
26
−958%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+488%
50
−488%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150
+614%
21−24
−614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+300%
24−27
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
+556%
18−20
−556%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+423%
24−27
−423%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+209%
30−35
−209%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+373%
40−45
−373%
Horizon Zero Dawn 279
+615%
35−40
−615%
Metro Exodus 113
+223%
35−40
−223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160
+493%
27
−493%
Watch Dogs: Legion 112
+433%
21−24
−433%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120
+264%
30−35
−264%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+548%
21−24
−548%
Far Cry New Dawn 143
+615%
20−22
−615%
Hitman 3 75−80
+394%
16−18
−394%
Red Dead Redemption 2 83
+938%
8−9
−938%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+492%
12−14
−492%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98
+1125%
8−9
−1125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+621%
14−16
−621%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1000%
6−7
−1000%
Far Cry 5 131
+589%
18−20
−589%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+591%
21−24
−591%
Horizon Zero Dawn 215
+796%
24−27
−796%
Metro Exodus 112
+489%
18−20
−489%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+1133%
18−20
−1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+850%
12−14
−850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
+1114%
7−8
−1114%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 40
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 126
+1045%
10−12
−1045%
Hitman 3 55−60
+600%
8−9
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+1043%
7−8
−1043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+1000%
10−11
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Battlefield 5 103
+836%
10−12
−836%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+914%
7−8
−914%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+607%
14−16
−607%
Horizon Zero Dawn 128
+967%
12−14
−967%
Metro Exodus 94
+683%
12−14
−683%
Watch Dogs: Legion 49
+1125%
4−5
−1125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 76
+591%
10−12
−591%

This is how RX 6800 XT and GeForce MX550 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 352% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 492% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 229% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 1450% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX550 is 21% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • GeForce MX550 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 64.76 11.82
Recency 18 November 2020 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop card while GeForce MX550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3115 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 696 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.