RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6700 XT

Place in performance ranking	48	38
Place by popularity	82	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.72	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Navi 22	AD104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$479	no data
Current price	$685 (1.4x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	6144
Core clock speed	2321 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2581 MHz	1565 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	413.0	300.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	280.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700 XT 51.34

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.03
+5.2%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon RX 6700 XT by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6700 XT 19869

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20908
+5.2%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon RX 6700 XT by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	157 −1.9%	160−170 +1.9%
1440p	89 −1.1%	90−95 +1.1%
4K	52 +4%	50−55 −4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

119

−0.8%

120−130
+0.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 −0.6%	170−180 +0.6%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −4.5%	140−150 +4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	99 −1%	100−105 +1%
Far Cry 5	178 −1.1%	180−190 +1.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	150 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −1.4%	150−160 +1.4%
Hitman 3	246 −1.6%	250−260 +1.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	163 −4.3%	170−180 +4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	206 −1.9%	210−220 +1.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	144 −4.2%	150−160 +4.2%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −4.5%	140−150 +4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	90 +0%	90−95 +0%
Far Cry 5	169 −0.6%	170−180 +0.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	145 −3.4%	150−160 +3.4%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −1.4%	150−160 +1.4%
Hitman 3	202 −4%	210−220 +4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	119 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	175 −2.9%	180−190 +2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	223 −3.1%	230−240 +3.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	134 −4.5%	140−150 +4.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	125 −4%	130−140 +4%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −4.5%	140−150 +4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	85 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	159 −0.6%	160−170 +0.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	131 +0.8%	130−140 −0.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −1.4%	150−160 +1.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	127 −2.4%	130−140 +2.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	84 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 −1.1%	90−95 +1.1%
Hitman 3	132 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	96 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	71 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110 +0%	110−120 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +1%	100−105 −1%
Cyberpunk 2077	56 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Far Cry 5	137 −2.2%	140−150 +2.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	123 +2.5%	120−130 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	62 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Hitman 3	75 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	25 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Metro Exodus	43 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Far Cry 5	71 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	76 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 +0%	35−40 +0%

This is how RX 6700 XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 2% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 1% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.34	54.03
Recency	3 March 2021	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	70 Watt