Radeon RX 6550M vs RX 6600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon RX 6550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600M
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
35.42
+46%

RX 6600M outperforms RX 6550M by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking131210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameR21M-E65-70Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2020 (3 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921024
Core clock speed2068 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2177 MHz2560 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt (50 - 100 Watt TGP)80 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate235.8181.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon RX 6550M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600M 35.42
+46%
RX 6550M 24.26

RX 6600M outperforms RX 6550M by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6600M 13679
+46%
RX 6550M 9370

RX 6600M outperforms RX 6550M by 46% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6600M 31868
+55.4%
RX 6550M 20506

RX 6600M outperforms RX 6550M by 55% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6600M 23525
+60.1%
RX 6550M 14696

RX 6600M outperforms RX 6550M by 60% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+33.8%
71
−33.8%
1440p54
+116%
25
−116%
4K31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 110 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 108 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 90 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 202 no data
Hitman 3 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 239 no data
Metro Exodus 100−110 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 216 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 120 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 106 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 72 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Metro Exodus 48 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 61 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 168 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 134 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 153 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 59 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 36 no data
Far Cry 5 90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 128 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 98 no data
Metro Exodus 85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 42 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 74 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 53 no data
Metro Exodus 48 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 21 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

This is how RX 6600M and RX 6550M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 34% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 116% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600M is 48% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.42 24.26
Recency 1 September 2020 5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6550M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 934 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 116 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.