Radeon 610M vs RX 6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon 610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
36.08
+1148%

RX 6600M outperforms 610M by a whopping 1148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137790
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Power efficiency24.8413.26
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23Dragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792128
Core clock speed2068 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate270.617.60
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1128
Ray Tracing Cores282

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600M 36.08
+1148%
Radeon 610M 2.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600M 13871
+1149%
Radeon 610M 1111

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600M 31868
+1013%
Radeon 610M 2863

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6600M 72686
+502%
Radeon 610M 12065

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600M 23525
+1097%
Radeon 610M 1965

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600M 144612
+941%
Radeon 610M 13898

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600M 479404
+191%
Radeon 610M 164666

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6600M 7840
+1262%
Radeon 610M 576

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+662%
13
−662%
1440p52
−17.3%
61
+17.3%
4K31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 92
+820%
10−11
−820%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+1733%
6−7
−1733%
Elden Ring 90
+1700%
5−6
−1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+650%
10−11
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Forza Horizon 4 216
+1037%
19
−1037%
Metro Exodus 100
+525%
16
−525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%
Valorant 160 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
Counter-Strike 2 66
+560%
10−11
−560%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+967%
6−7
−967%
Dota 2 115
+1050%
10
−1050%
Elden Ring 113
+2160%
5−6
−2160%
Far Cry 5 46
+119%
21
−119%
Fortnite 160−170
+913%
16−18
−913%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+1136%
14
−1136%
Grand Theft Auto V 116
+625%
16
−625%
Metro Exodus 78
+609%
11
−609%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+615%
27−30
−615%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+1045%
10−12
−1045%
Valorant 140−150 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280
+437%
50−55
−437%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+390%
10−11
−390%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+800%
6−7
−800%
Dota 2 104
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+481%
16−18
−481%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+1291%
11
−1291%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+615%
27−30
−615%
Valorant 144 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 61 0−1
Elden Ring 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+775%
20−22
−775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
World of Tanks 230−240
+1050%
20−22
−1050%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1557%
7−8
−1557%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+9900%
1−2
−9900%
Metro Exodus 85
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+1450%
4−5
−1450%
Valorant 100−110
+1111%
9−10
−1111%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Dota 2 58
+263%
16−18
−263%
Elden Ring 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+287%
14−16
−287%
Metro Exodus 28
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+1338%
8−9
−1338%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+287%
14−16
−287%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 80
+400%
16−18
−400%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Fortnite 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Valorant 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%

This is how RX 6600M and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 662% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 610M is 17% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600M is 1450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600M is 9900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600M surpassed Radeon 610M in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.08 2.89
Recency 31 May 2021 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6600M has a 1148.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1014 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 804 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.