Radeon RX 7600 XT vs RX 6700M

Place in performance ranking	138	67
Place by popularity	not in top-100	69
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	29.82
Architecture	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	R21M-E110-70	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2020 (3 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329
Current price	no data	$477 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Boost clock speed	2300 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	324.0	352.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6700M and Radeon RX 7600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	204 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700M 34.86

RX 7600 XT 45.07
+29.3%

RX 7600 XT outperforms RX 6700M by 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6700M 13464

RX 7600 XT 17404
+29.3%

RX 7600 XT outperforms RX 6700M by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

124

−29%

160−170
+29%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

−33.3%

60−65
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −40%	60−65 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 −30.7%	98 +30.7%
Battlefield 5	85−90 −32.9%	110−120 +32.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −42%	70−75 +42%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −40%	75−80 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −35.4%	85−90 +35.4%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −38%	130−140 +38%
Hitman 3	85−90 −30.6%	111 +30.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −40%	140−150 +40%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −30%	100−110 +30%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 −33.3%	100 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −34.7%	202 +34.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −37.1%	96 +37.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −40%	60−65 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −36.7%	82 +36.7%
Battlefield 5	85−90 −32.9%	110−120 +32.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −42%	70−75 +42%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −40%	75−80 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −35.4%	85−90 +35.4%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −38%	130−140 +38%
Hitman 3	65−70 −33.8%	87 +33.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −40%	140−150 +40%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −30%	100−110 +30%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −30%	91 +30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −32.9%	186 +32.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −36.7%	164 +36.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −36.9%	85−90 +36.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −40%	60−65 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −42%	71 +42%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −42%	70−75 +42%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −40%	75−80 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −38%	130−140 +38%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −40%	140−150 +40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −30.8%	170 +30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −35.7%	95 +35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −42.2%	64 +42.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−35.4%

88
+35.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −32%	65−70 +32%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −33.3%	80−85 +33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −37%	35−40 +37%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −40.7%	35−40 +40.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −30%	50−55 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −40%	60−65 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −30.9%	70−75 +30.9%
Hitman 3	30−33 −46.7%	40−45 +46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −34.5%	70−75 +34.5%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −32%	65−70 +32%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −38.3%	80−85 +38.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −37.1%	45−50 +37.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−33.3%

60−65
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −38.1%	27−30 +38.1%
Hitman 3	21−24 −33.3%	27−30 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −43.3%	40−45 +43.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −36.7%	40−45 +36.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −43.8%	21−24 +43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −37.5%	21−24 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −42.9%	20−22 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −37.1%	45−50 +37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −43.3%	40−45 +43.3%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −33.3%	35−40 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−47.6%

30−35
+47.6%

This is how RX 6700M and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600 XT is 29% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.86	45.07
Recency	1 September 2020	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	135 Watt	190 Watt