Radeon Pro W6600M vs RX 6600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 XT with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

RX 6600 XT
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
36.89
+43%

RX 6600 XT outperforms Pro W6600M by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking96207
Place by popularity72not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.14no data
Power efficiency18.3022.74
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date30 July 2021 (3 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed1968 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed2589 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate331.4227.8
Floating-point processing power10.6 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128112
Ray Tracing Cores3228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6600 XT 36.89
+43%
Pro W6600M 25.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 XT 16483
+43%
Pro W6600M 11524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+50.6%
85−90
−50.6%
1440p71
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
4K41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.96no data
1440p5.34no data
4K9.24no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+39.1%
160−170
−39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+27.4%
60−65
−27.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+26.4%
100−110
−26.4%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+39.1%
160−170
−39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+25.8%
60−65
−25.8%
Far Cry 5 151
+64.1%
90−95
−64.1%
Fortnite 170−180
+29.5%
130−140
−29.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+39.1%
110−120
−39.1%
Forza Horizon 5 159
+78.7%
85−90
−78.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+39.6%
110−120
−39.6%
Valorant 220−230
+25.8%
180−190
−25.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+26.4%
100−110
−26.4%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+39.1%
160−170
−39.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+3.3%
260−270
−3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+22.6%
60−65
−22.6%
Dota 2 170
+30.8%
130−140
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 141
+53.3%
90−95
−53.3%
Fortnite 170−180
+29.5%
130−140
−29.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+39.1%
110−120
−39.1%
Forza Horizon 5 142
+59.6%
85−90
−59.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 135
+35%
100−105
−35%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Metro Exodus 95
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+39.6%
110−120
−39.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 176
+100%
85−90
−100%
Valorant 220−230
+25.8%
180−190
−25.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+26.4%
100−110
−26.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+11.3%
60−65
−11.3%
Dota 2 120
−8.3%
130−140
+8.3%
Far Cry 5 133
+44.6%
90−95
−44.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+39.1%
110−120
−39.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+39.6%
110−120
−39.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Valorant 220−230
+25.8%
180−190
−25.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+29.5%
130−140
−29.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+58.5%
65−70
−58.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+40.5%
190−200
−40.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+28.3%
50−55
−28.3%
Metro Exodus 56
+47.4%
35−40
−47.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+18.2%
220−230
−18.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+32.9%
75−80
−32.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Far Cry 5 105
+61.5%
65−70
−61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+54.1%
70−75
−54.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+46.9%
30−35
−46.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+55.1%
45−50
−55.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+52.2%
65−70
−52.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+18.5%
50−55
−18.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Metro Exodus 34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+25.6%
40−45
−25.6%
Valorant 240−250
+44.3%
160−170
−44.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+46.5%
40−45
−46.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Dota 2 86
−2.3%
85−90
+2.3%
Far Cry 5 51
+54.5%
30−35
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+52%
50−55
−52%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+71.9%
30−35
−71.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+62.5%
30−35
−62.5%

This is how RX 6600 XT and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 51% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 58% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 52% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 100% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is ahead in 63 tests (95%)
  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.89 25.79
Recency 30 July 2021 8 June 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 90 Watt

RX 6600 XT has a 43% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has 77.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4658 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600 XT or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.