RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6500 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RX 6500 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 265 | 142 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Ada Lovelace |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 21 March 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 4608 |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX 6500 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 16000 MHz |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 Ultimate |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−88.9%
|
30−35
+88.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−85.7%
|
65−70
+85.7%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−90.5%
|
40−45
+90.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−91.7%
|
45−50
+91.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−76.7%
|
50−55
+76.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
−73.3%
|
75−80
+73.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−80%
|
50−55
+80%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35−40
−82.9%
|
60−65
+82.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−88.9%
|
30−35
+88.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−85.7%
|
65−70
+85.7%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−90.5%
|
40−45
+90.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−91.7%
|
45−50
+91.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−76.7%
|
50−55
+76.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
−73.3%
|
75−80
+73.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−88.6%
|
65−70
+88.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−80%
|
50−55
+80%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35−40
−82.9%
|
60−65
+82.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−79.2%
|
40−45
+79.2%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−88.9%
|
30−35
+88.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−85.7%
|
65−70
+85.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−93.8%
|
30−35
+93.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−91.7%
|
45−50
+91.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−76.7%
|
50−55
+76.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−79.2%
|
40−45
+79.2%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−78.6%
|
24−27
+78.6%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
−91.7%
|
21−24
+91.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−90.5%
|
40−45
+90.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−76.2%
|
35−40
+76.2%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−83.3%
|
30−35
+83.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
−90.5%
|
40−45
+90.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
−80%
|
18−20
+80%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−81%
|
35−40
+81%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−83.3%
|
30−35
+83.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8
−85.7%
|
12−14
+85.7%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8−9
−87.5%
|
14−16
+87.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−83.3%
|
21−24
+83.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−88.9%
|
16−18
+88.9%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−85.7%
|
12−14
+85.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 8−9
−87.5%
|
14−16
+87.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−92.9%
|
27−30
+92.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
