Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile with Moore Threads MTT S80, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.89
+282%

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Moore Threads MTT S80 by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking258618
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Power efficiency29.081.79
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)MUSA
GPU code nameGN20-P0-R 6 GBChunxiao
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2023 (2 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1237 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1492 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)255 Watt
Texture fill rateno data460.8
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data256
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
+289%
18−20
−289%
1440p34
+325%
8−9
−325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+343%
30−33
−343%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+286%
21−24
−286%
God of War 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+343%
30−33
−343%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+300%
16−18
−300%
Far Cry 5 85
+305%
21−24
−305%
Fortnite 110−120
+287%
30−33
−287%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+311%
18−20
−311%
God of War 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+333%
21−24
−333%
Valorant 160−170
+308%
40−45
−308%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+343%
30−33
−343%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+291%
65−70
−291%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+283%
12−14
−283%
Dota 2 120−130
+303%
30−33
−303%
Far Cry 5 78
+333%
18−20
−333%
Fortnite 110−120
+287%
30−33
−287%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+311%
18−20
−311%
God of War 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Grand Theft Auto V 92
+283%
24−27
−283%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+325%
12−14
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+333%
21−24
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+333%
21−24
−333%
Valorant 160−170
+308%
40−45
−308%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+290%
10−11
−290%
Dota 2 120−130
+303%
30−33
−303%
Far Cry 5 74
+311%
18−20
−311%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+288%
24−27
−288%
God of War 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+333%
21−24
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+317%
12−14
−317%
Valorant 160−170
+308%
40−45
−308%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+287%
30−33
−287%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+315%
40−45
−315%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+300%
10−11
−300%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+289%
45−50
−289%
Valorant 200−210
+300%
50−55
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Far Cry 5 52
+333%
12−14
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
God of War 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+311%
9−10
−311%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+300%
14−16
−300%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Valorant 130−140
+289%
35−40
−289%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Dota 2 75−80
+328%
18−20
−328%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
God of War 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and Moore Threads MTT S80 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 289% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 325% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.89 6.00
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 255 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 281.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.

Moore Threads MTT S80, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Moore Threads MTT S80 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S80 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 918 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.