Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 580

Place in performance ranking	226	250
Place by popularity	1	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.84	4.69
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data
Current price	$138 (0.6x MSRP)	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 has 323% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1024
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	193.0	114.2
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 580 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 22.94
+11.2%

T2000 Mobile 20.63

Radeon RX 580 outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 580 8876
+11.2%

T2000 Mobile 7985

Radeon RX 580 outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 11% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 580 19274
+42.5%

T2000 Mobile 13524

Radeon RX 580 outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 43% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	97 +14.1%	85−90 −14.1%
1440p	43 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
4K	36 +20%	30−35 −20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+12.1%

30−35

−12.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +38.1%	40−45 −38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +11.1%	35−40 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	124 +79.7%	65−70 −79.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +11.1%	50−55 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Far Cry 5	83 +53.7%	50−55 −53.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	83 +50.9%	55−60 −50.9%
Forza Horizon 4	108 +54.3%	70−75 −54.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +11.4%	40−45 −11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +8.8%	30−35 −8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	74 +68.2%	40−45 −68.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	47 +11.9%	40−45 −11.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +11.1%	35−40 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	102 +47.8%	65−70 −47.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +11.1%	50−55 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Far Cry 5	76 +40.7%	50−55 −40.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	78 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Forza Horizon 4	101 +44.3%	70−75 −44.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +11.4%	40−45 −11.4%
Metro Exodus	48 +45.5%	30−35 −45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +8.8%	30−35 −8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +43.2%	40−45 −43.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 +60%	45−50 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	34 −23.5%	40−45 +23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +11.1%	35−40 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	93 +34.8%	65−70 −34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Far Cry 5	71 +31.5%	50−55 −31.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	71 +29.1%	55−60 −29.1%
Forza Horizon 4	82 +17.1%	70−75 −17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +12.9%	30−35 −12.9%
Hitman 3	35−40 +15.2%	30−35 −15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	28 +40%	20−22 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +13.6%	21−24 −13.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +10.9%	45−50 −10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	53 +35.9%	35−40 −35.9%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +11.9%	40−45 −11.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Hitman 3	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Metro Exodus	18 +50%	12−14 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Battlefield 5	37 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	26 +52.9%	16−18 −52.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 +45%	20−22 −45%
Forza Horizon 4	41 +41.4%	27−30 −41.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%

This is how RX 580 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RX 580 is 14.1% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1080p
RX 580 is 22.9% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1440p
RX 580 is 20% faster than T2000 Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 580 is 79.7% faster than the T2000 Mobile.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 23.5% faster than the RX 580.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 580 is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
T2000 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.94	20.63
Recency	18 April 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	60 Watt