GeForce GTX 670 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

Place in the ranking	273	376
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.05	3.38
Power efficiency	14.69	5.96
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	GK104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	10 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$301.69	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 Mobile has 612% better value for money than GTX 670.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1344
CUDA cores	no data	1344
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	1077 MHz	980 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	170 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	97 °C
Texture fill rate	155.1	109.8
Floating-point processing power	4.963 TFLOPS	2.634 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144	112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	192.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	4 displays
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 Mobile 20.02
+45%

GTX 670 13.81

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 Mobile 11261
+60.9%

GTX 670 7000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	79 +58%	50−55 −58%
4K	30 +66.7%	18−21 −66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+57.1%

21−24

−57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +48.2%	85−90 −48.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +52.3%	65−70 −52.3%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +57.8%	45−50 −57.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +55%	60−65 −55%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +48.2%	85−90 −48.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +52.3%	65−70 −52.3%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +57.8%	45−50 −57.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +55%	60−65 −55%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +48.2%	85−90 −48.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +52.3%	65−70 −52.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +55%	60−65 −55%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+57.1%

35−40

−57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +53.3%	75−80 −53.3%
Hitman 3	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +51.3%	80−85 −51.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+61.9%

21−24

−61.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Hitman 3	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +52.9%	70−75 −52.9%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 +50%	16−18 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+50%

12−14

−50%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and GTX 670 compete in popular games:

RX 580 Mobile is 58% faster in 1080p
RX 580 Mobile is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.02	13.81
Recency	18 April 2017	10 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	170 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 45% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 670 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.