GeForce 9500M G vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile and GeForce 9500M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 580 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
19.44
+6171%

RX 580 Mobile outperforms 9500M G by a whopping 6171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2881317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.49no data
Power efficiency13.321.06
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 20G96
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1000 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate155.14.000
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPS0.04 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data60
ROPs328
TMUs1448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
4K30-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.92no data
4K10.06no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Hitman 3 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+1138%
8−9
−1138%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+232%
27−30
−232%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Hitman 3 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+1138%
8−9
−1138%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+232%
27−30
−232%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Hitman 3 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+1138%
8−9
−1138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+311%
9−10
−311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+232%
27−30
−232%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+11400%
1−2
−11400%
Hitman 3 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+12000%
1−2
−12000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and 9500M G compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 Mobile is 7600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 580 Mobile is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 580 Mobile surpassed 9500M G in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 0.31
Recency 18 April 2017 3 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 20 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 6171% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

9500M G, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9500M G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
GeForce 9500M G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GeForce 9500M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.