Radeon Pro W6600M vs RX 5700

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
37.40
+51.5%

RX 5700 outperforms Pro W6600M by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking124221
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.35no data
Power efficiency14.3618.96
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed1465 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate248.4227.8
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length268 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 37.40
+51.5%
Pro W6600M 24.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 14430
+51.6%
Pro W6600M 9521

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+52%
75−80
−52%
1440p67
+67.5%
40−45
−67.5%
4K42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
1440p5.21no data
4K8.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 84
+40%
60−65
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 97
+61.7%
60−65
−61.7%
Battlefield 5 180
+57.9%
110−120
−57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
+43.7%
70−75
−43.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+25%
60−65
−25%
Far Cry 5 112
+43.6%
75−80
−43.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 99
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 288
+59.1%
180−190
−59.1%
Hitman 3 76
+2.7%
70−75
−2.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 294
+96%
150−160
−96%
Metro Exodus 144
+24.1%
110−120
−24.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+32.9%
85−90
−32.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+7.9%
120−130
−7.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 259
+112%
120−130
−112%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130
+73.3%
75−80
−73.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 145
+27.2%
110−120
−27.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 92
+29.6%
70−75
−29.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Far Cry 5 90
+15.4%
75−80
−15.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
+2.3%
85−90
−2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 276
+52.5%
180−190
−52.5%
Hitman 3 75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 291
+94%
150−160
−94%
Metro Exodus 143
+23.3%
110−120
−23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+15.3%
85−90
−15.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 175
+38.9%
120−130
−38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+6.8%
70−75
−6.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 243
+99.2%
120−130
−99.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60
−25%
75−80
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 77
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
−4.4%
70−75
+4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 64
−21.9%
75−80
+21.9%
Forza Horizon 4 118
−53.4%
180−190
+53.4%
Hitman 3 73
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 119
−26.1%
150−160
+26.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 155
+23%
120−130
−23%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+24.7%
70−75
−24.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
−110%
120−130
+110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 102
+20%
85−90
−20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+52.2%
65−70
−52.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 73
+35.2%
50−55
−35.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+39.5%
35−40
−39.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+22%
40−45
−22%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+38.5%
24−27
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 52
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Forza Horizon 4 267
+33.5%
200−210
−33.5%
Hitman 3 55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 93
+24%
75−80
−24%
Metro Exodus 94
+42.4%
65−70
−42.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+30.1%
80−85
−30.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
+36.3%
170−180
−36.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+34.5%
27−30
−34.5%
Hitman 3 39
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
−45.7%
160−170
+45.7%
Metro Exodus 57
+32.6%
40−45
−32.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+17.1%
40−45
−17.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 26
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Far Cry 5 26
+30%
20−22
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+45.8%
45−50
−45.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+36.2%
45−50
−36.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%

This is how RX 5700 and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 52% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 68% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 56% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5700 is 112% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 110% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.40 24.68
Recency 7 July 2019 8 June 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 90 Watt

RX 5700 has a 51.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1735 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.