CMP 30HX vs Radeon RX 5700

Place in the ranking	133	269
Place by popularity	43	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	43.54	23.66
Power efficiency	14.25	11.61
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	TU116
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)	25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 5700 has 84% better value for money than CMP 30HX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1408
Core clock speed	1465 MHz	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	248.4	157.1
Floating-point processing power	7.949 TFLOPS	5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	144	88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	268 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5700 36.95
+76.7%

CMP 30HX 20.91

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 14377
+76.7%

CMP 30HX 8135

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 5700 68796
+1.2%

CMP 30HX 67947

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	118 +81.5%	65−70 −81.5%
1440p	71 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%
4K	44 +83.3%	24−27 −83.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.96 +316%	12.29 −316%
1440p	4.92 +306%	19.98 −306%
4K	7.93 +320%	33.29 −320%

RX 5700 has 316% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 5700 has 306% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 5700 has 320% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	159 +87.1%	85−90 −87.1%
Counter-Strike 2	82 +82.2%	45−50 −82.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	84 +86.7%	45−50 −86.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	121 +86.2%	65−70 −86.2%
Battlefield 5	115 +76.9%	65−70 −76.9%
Counter-Strike 2	67 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 +87.5%	40−45 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	156 +83.5%	85−90 −83.5%
Fortnite	166 +84.4%	90−95 −84.4%
Forza Horizon 4	132 +88.6%	70−75 −88.6%
Forza Horizon 5	126 +80%	70−75 −80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	151 +77.6%	85−90 −77.6%
Valorant	294 +83.8%	160−170 −83.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	70 +100%	35−40 −100%
Battlefield 5	105 +90.9%	55−60 −90.9%
Counter-Strike 2	57 +90%	30−33 −90%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +84.7%	150−160 −84.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%
Dota 2	156 +83.5%	85−90 −83.5%
Far Cry 5	144 +80%	80−85 −80%
Fortnite	140 +86.7%	75−80 −86.7%
Forza Horizon 4	130 +85.7%	70−75 −85.7%
Forza Horizon 5	97 +94%	50−55 −94%
Grand Theft Auto V	137 +82.7%	75−80 −82.7%
Metro Exodus	87 +93.3%	45−50 −93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	144 +80%	80−85 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147 +83.8%	80−85 −83.8%
Valorant	291 +81.9%	160−170 −81.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	97 +94%	50−55 −94%
Counter-Strike 2	50 +85.2%	27−30 −85.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	58 +93.3%	30−33 −93.3%
Dota 2	146 +82.5%	80−85 −82.5%
Far Cry 5	135 +80%	75−80 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	118 +81.5%	65−70 −81.5%
Forza Horizon 5	94 +88%	50−55 −88%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	139 +85.3%	75−80 −85.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	91 +82%	50−55 −82%
Valorant	160 +77.8%	90−95 −77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

118

+81.5%

65−70
−81.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	230−240 +83.8%	130−140 −83.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	72 +80%	40−45 −80%
Metro Exodus	51 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +84.2%	95−100 −84.2%
Valorant	277 +84.7%	150−160 −84.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	81 +80%	45−50 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +100%	18−20 −100%
Far Cry 5	93 +86%	50−55 −86%
Forza Horizon 4	103 +87.3%	55−60 −87.3%
Forza Horizon 5	64 +82.9%	35−40 −82.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +80%	35−40 −80%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

77
+92.5%

40−45

−92.5%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	72 +80%	40−45 −80%
Metro Exodus	31 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	48 +77.8%	27−30 −77.8%
Valorant	231 +77.7%	130−140 −77.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	54 +80%	30−33 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	7 +133%	3−4 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Dota 2	100 +81.8%	55−60 −81.8%
Far Cry 5	47 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +100%	35−40 −100%
Forza Horizon 5	34 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	59 +96.7%	30−33 −96.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

39
+85.7%

21−24

−85.7%

This is how RX 5700 and CMP 30HX compete in popular games:

RX 5700 is 82% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 is 78% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 is 83% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.95	20.91
Recency	7 July 2019	25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	125 Watt