Radeon RX 7800 XT vs RX 5700 XT

Place in the ranking	90	30
Place by popularity	54	60
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.50	67.89
Power efficiency	13.15	16.53
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 10	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 46% better value for money than RX 5700 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	3840
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1905 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	304.8	583.2
Floating-point processing power	9.754 TFLOPS	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	160	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	272 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Multi Monitor	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 XT 42.87

RX 7800 XT 63.01
+47%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 XT 16486

RX 7800 XT 24229
+47%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5700 XT 35823

RX 7800 XT 65611
+83.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5700 XT 83961

RX 7800 XT 134322
+60%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5700 XT 26189

RX 7800 XT 49707
+89.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5700 XT 146093

RX 7800 XT 202773
+38.8%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5700 XT 499658

RX 7800 XT 745990
+49.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	127 −69.3%	215 +69.3%
1440p	76 −60.5%	122 +60.5%
4K	48 −52.1%	73 +52.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.14 −35.4%	2.32 +35.4%
1440p	5.25 −28.4%	4.09 +28.4%
4K	8.31 −21.6%	6.84 +21.6%

RX 7800 XT has 35% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7800 XT has 28% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7800 XT has 22% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	93 −159%	241 +159%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 −231%	258 +231%
Elden Ring	133 −69.2%	225 +69.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	93 −25.8%	110−120 +25.8%
Counter-Strike 2	76 −163%	200 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	82 −17.1%	96 +17.1%
Forza Horizon 4	234 −109%	488 +109%
Metro Exodus	156 −9.6%	171 +9.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	115 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	190 −54.2%	290−300 +54.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	194 +65.8%	110−120 −65.8%
Counter-Strike 2	64 −155%	163 +155%
Cyberpunk 2077	72 −11.1%	80 +11.1%
Dota 2	127 −40.2%	178 +40.2%
Elden Ring	157 −52.2%	230−240 +52.2%
Far Cry 5	57 −98.2%	113 +98.2%
Fortnite	180−190 −35.7%	240−250 +35.7%
Forza Horizon 4	193 −106%	398 +106%
Grand Theft Auto V	145 −22.8%	178 +22.8%
Metro Exodus	111 −32.4%	147 +32.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	246 +14.4%	210−220 −14.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	66 −74.2%	110−120 +74.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 −12.3%	170−180 +12.3%
Valorant	112 −162%	290−300 +162%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	81 −44.4%	110−120 +44.4%
Counter-Strike 2	57 −161%	149 +161%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 −17.5%	74 +17.5%
Dota 2	103 −45.6%	150−160 +45.6%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −21.8%	120−130 +21.8%
Forza Horizon 4	171 −98.8%	340 +98.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −3.9%	210−220 +3.9%
Valorant	159 −84.3%	290−300 +84.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	79 −77.2%	140 +77.2%
Elden Ring	88 −79.5%	150−160 +79.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 −77.2%	140 +77.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 −81%	75−80 +81%
World of Tanks	270−280 −56.1%	400−450 +56.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 −8.8%	85−90 +8.8%
Counter-Strike 2	36 −169%	97 +169%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −23.1%	48 +23.1%
Far Cry 5	130−140 −15.9%	160−170 +15.9%
Forza Horizon 4	119 −104%	243 +104%
Metro Exodus	104 −42.3%	148 +42.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −90.9%	147 +90.9%
Valorant	119 −114%	250−260 +114%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	28 −50%	42 +50%
Dota 2	79 −92.4%	152 +92.4%
Elden Ring	39 −110%	80−85 +110%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 −92.4%	152 +92.4%
Metro Exodus	35 −80%	63 +80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	144 −45.1%	200−210 +45.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 −92.4%	152 +92.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 −55.8%	80−85 +55.8%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −66.7%	75−80 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −29.4%	22 +29.4%
Dota 2	93 −39.8%	130−140 +39.8%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −59.1%	100−110 +59.1%
Fortnite	60−65 −52.4%	95−100 +52.4%
Forza Horizon 4	71 −83.1%	130 +83.1%
Valorant	62 −134%	140−150 +134%

This is how RX 5700 XT and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 69% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 61% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 52% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 66% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 231% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RX 7800 XT is ahead in 56 tests (92%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.87	63.01
Recency	7 July 2019	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	263 Watt

RX 5700 XT has 16.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 47% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700 XT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.