Radeon Pro W6600 vs RX 5700 XT

Place in performance ranking	75	92
Place by popularity	61	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	22.53
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$649
Current price	$111 (0.3x MSRP)	$1522 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 344% better value for money than Pro W6600.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1792
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1905 MHz	2903 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	304.8	325.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	272 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Multi Monitor	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 XT 43.06
+5.1%

Pro W6600 40.97

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro W6600 by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5700 XT 16629
+5.1%

Pro W6600 15824

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro W6600 by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	122 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
1440p	74 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
4K	47 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

80−85
+2.6%

−2.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −1.3%	76 +1.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +0%	110 +0%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +0.5%	199 −0.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +1.7%	118 −1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +2.6%	78 −2.6%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +4%	125 −4%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +1.7%	118 −1.7%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +3.2%	155 −3.2%
Hitman 3	85−90 +1.2%	84 −1.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +4.4%	249 −4.4%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +4.2%	144 −4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +4.3%	115 −4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 +2.6%	234 −2.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −0.8%	121 +0.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +0%	70 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +4.4%	91 −4.4%
Battlefield 5	170−180 +3%	165 −3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +2.8%	107 −2.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −1%	101 +1%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +1.9%	108 −1.9%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +2.5%	283 −2.5%
Hitman 3	90−95 +1.1%	89 −1.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +2%	294 −2%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +2%	147 −2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +4.3%	115 −4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 +3.6%	193 −3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +3.9%	154 −3.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	260−270 +4.8%	248 −4.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +4.8%	62 −4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 +2.6%	78 −2.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +0%	80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +4.5%	67 −4.5%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +2.7%	73 −2.7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +1.4%	148 −1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +3.7%	135 −3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −0.6%	171 +0.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +2.2%	93 −2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +4.5%	67 −4.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120
+1.9%

108

−1.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	130−140 +3.2%	126 −3.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +2.6%	117 −2.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +3.8%	53 −3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +1.7%	59 −1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +2.6%	78 −2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +3.1%	97 −3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0.8%	119 −0.8%
Hitman 3	60−65 +1.7%	59 −1.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −4%	104 +4%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −4%	104 +4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +0.8%	119 −0.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −2.2%	46 +2.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+1.3%

−1.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −1.8%	56 +1.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +2.3%	44 −2.3%
Hitman 3	45−50 +0%	45 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −1.8%	55−60 +1.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +2.6%	39 −2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +1.9%	54 −1.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +0%	35 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −10%	33 +10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −10%	33 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +1.3%	79 −1.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +3.2%	63 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −1.8%	56 +1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −8.3%	13 +8.3%