Radeon Pro W6400 vs RX 5700 XT

Place in performance ranking	75	248
Place by popularity	44	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	69.32
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	Navi 24
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$111 (0.3x MSRP)	$206

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 44% better value for money than Pro W6400.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	768
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1905 MHz	2331 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	304.8	111.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	272 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Multi Monitor	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 XT 43.03
+108%

Pro W6400 20.65

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro W6400 by 108% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5700 XT 16647
+108%

Pro W6400 7988

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro W6400 by 108% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	122 +122%	55−60 −122%
1440p	77 +120%	35−40 −120%
4K	50 +138%	21−24 −138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

78
+123%

35−40

−123%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	76 +117%	35−40 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110 +120%	50−55 −120%
Battlefield 5	199 +109%	95−100 −109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 +115%	55−60 −115%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +123%	35−40 −123%
Far Cry 5	125 +127%	55−60 −127%
Far Cry New Dawn	118 +115%	55−60 −115%
Forza Horizon 4	155 +121%	70−75 −121%
Hitman 3	172 +115%	80−85 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	249 +126%	110−120 −126%
Metro Exodus	144 +122%	65−70 −122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	115 +109%	55−60 −109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	234 +113%	110−120 −113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	121 +120%	55−60 −120%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70 +133%	30−33 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91 +128%	40−45 −128%
Battlefield 5	165 +120%	75−80 −120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	128 +113%	60−65 −113%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 +114%	35−40 −114%
Far Cry 5	57 +111%	27−30 −111%
Far Cry New Dawn	128 +113%	60−65 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	154 +120%	70−75 −120%
Hitman 3	89 +123%	40−45 −123%
Horizon Zero Dawn	202 +113%	95−100 −113%
Metro Exodus	149 +113%	70−75 −113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	115 +109%	55−60 −109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	154 +120%	70−75 −120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	154 +120%	70−75 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	106 +112%	50−55 −112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +130%	27−30 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +123%	35−40 −123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80 +129%	35−40 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 +123%	30−33 −123%
Far Cry 5	73 +109%	35−40 −109%
Forza Horizon 4	148 +111%	70−75 −111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	135 +125%	60−65 −125%
Metro Exodus	97 +116%	45−50 −116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	93 +133%	40−45 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	67 +123%	30−33 −123%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

+116%

50−55
−116%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	126 +110%	60−65 −110%
Far Cry New Dawn	117 +113%	55−60 −113%
Hitman 3	73 +109%	35−40 −109%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +133%	18−20 −133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 +121%	24−27 −121%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +119%	27−30 −119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	78 +123%	35−40 −123%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +122%	18−20 −122%
Far Cry 5	97 +116%	45−50 −116%
Forza Horizon 4	119 +116%	55−60 −116%
Horizon Zero Dawn	104 +131%	45−50 −131%
Metro Exodus	104 +131%	45−50 −131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	119 +116%	55−60 −116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +113%	30−33 −113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	46 +119%	21−24 −119%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	44 +110%	21−24 −110%
Far Cry New Dawn	65 +117%	30−33 −117%
Hitman 3	45 +114%	21−24 −114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +133%	24−27 −133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +117%	18−20 −117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +125%	24−27 −125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 +119%	16−18 −119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	33 +136%	14−16 −136%
Battlefield 5	60 +122%	27−30 −122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	48 +129%	21−24 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +113%	8−9 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +126%	35−40 −126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 +110%	30−33 −110%
Metro Exodus	56 +133%	24−27 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	13 +117%	6−7 −117%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40
+122%

18−20

−122%

This is how RX 5700 XT and Pro W6400 compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 122% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 120% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 138% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	43.03	20.65
Recency	7 July 2019	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	50 Watt