GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon RX 5700 XT

Place in performance ranking	75	323
Place by popularity	61	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$111 (0.3x MSRP)	$1574

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2048
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1905 MHz	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	304.8	73.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	272 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Multi Monitor	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 XT 43.06
+179%

MX570 A 15.43

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce MX570 A by 179% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5700 XT 16630
+179%

MX570 A 5957

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce MX570 A by 179% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	122 +205%	40−45 −205%
1440p	74 +208%	24−27 −208%
4K	47 +194%	16−18 −194%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

210−220

+169%

78
−169%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	210−220 +176%	76 −176%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	300−310 +173%	110 −173%
Battlefield 5	550−600 +176%	199 −176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	300−310 +154%	118 −154%
Cyberpunk 2077	210−220 +169%	78 −169%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +140%	125 −140%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +154%	118 −154%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +158%	155 −158%
Hitman 3	230−240 +174%	84 −174%
Horizon Zero Dawn	650−700 +161%	249 −161%
Metro Exodus	400−450 +178%	144 −178%
Red Dead Redemption 2	300−310 +161%	115 −161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	650−700 +178%	234 −178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +148%	121 −148%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	190−200 +171%	70 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	250−260 +175%	91 −175%
Battlefield 5	450−500 +173%	165 −173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	290−300 +171%	107 −171%
Cyberpunk 2077	200−210 +167%	75 −167%
Far Cry 5	280−290 +177%	101 −177%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +178%	108 −178%
Forza Horizon 4	750−800 +165%	283 −165%
Hitman 3	240−250 +170%	89 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	800−850 +172%	294 −172%
Metro Exodus	400−450 +172%	147 −172%
Red Dead Redemption 2	300−310 +161%	115 −161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	500−550 +159%	193 −159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	400−450 +160%	154 −160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	650−700 +162%	248 −162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	170−180 +174%	62 −174%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	210−220 +169%	78 −169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	220−230 +175%	80 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +169%	67 −169%
Far Cry 5	200−210 +174%	73 −174%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +170%	148 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +159%	135 −159%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +163%	171 −163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	250−260 +169%	93 −169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +169%	67 −169%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

300−310
+178%

108

−178%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	350−400 +178%	126 −178%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +156%	117 −156%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	140−150 +164%	53 −164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	160−170 +171%	59 −171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	210−220 +169%	78 −169%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +175%	40 −175%
Far Cry 5	270−280 +178%	97 −178%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +152%	119 −152%
Hitman 3	160−170 +171%	59 −171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	290−300 +179%	104 −179%
Metro Exodus	290−300 +179%	104 −179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +152%	119 −152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190 +177%	65−70 −177%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +161%	46 −161%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

220−230

+178%

79
−178%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	150−160 +168%	56 −168%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +173%	44 −173%
Hitman 3	120−130 +167%	45 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +168%	55−60 −168%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +156%	39 −156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +178%	54 −178%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +171%	35 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +173%	33 −173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +173%	33 −173%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +165%	17 −165%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +167%	30 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +178%	79 −178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +170%	63 −170%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +168%	56 −168%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +169%	13 −169%