GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Radeon RX 570

Place in the ranking	310	395
Place by popularity	22	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.42	no data
Power efficiency	10.40	5.87
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$169	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1920
Core clock speed	1168 MHz	811 MHz
Boost clock speed	1244 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	159.2	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.095 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	128	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2x 3 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	2x 192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Optimus	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	+	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 570 18.13
+41.8%

GTX 770M SLI 12.79

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 570 18967
+98.2%

GTX 770M SLI 9569

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	83 +50.9%	55−60 −50.9%
1440p	48 +60%	30−35 −60%
4K	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.04	no data
1440p	3.52	no data
4K	5.63	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +39.1%	21−24 −39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +44%	24−27 −44%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	71 +69%	40−45 −69%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +39.1%	21−24 −39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +44%	24−27 −44%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +44.2%	50−55 −44.2%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +45.5%	30−35 −45.5%
Metro Exodus	76 +117%	35−40 −117%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +34.4%	30−35 −34.4%
Valorant	70−75 +43.1%	50−55 −43.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	102 +143%	40−45 −143%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +39.1%	21−24 −39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +44%	24−27 −44%
Dota 2	49 +6.5%	45−50 −6.5%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +28.6%	45−50 −28.6%
Fortnite	102 +39.7%	70−75 −39.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +44.2%	50−55 −44.2%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +45.5%	30−35 −45.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	73 +58.7%	45−50 −58.7%
Metro Exodus	51 +45.7%	35−40 −45.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +31.6%	95−100 −31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +34.4%	30−35 −34.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +43.6%	35−40 −43.6%
Valorant	70−75 +43.1%	50−55 −43.1%
World of Tanks	210−220 +26.6%	170−180 −26.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	58 +38.1%	40−45 −38.1%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +39.1%	21−24 −39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +44%	24−27 −44%
Dota 2	65−70 +41.3%	45−50 −41.3%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +28.6%	45−50 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +44.2%	50−55 −44.2%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +45.5%	30−35 −45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	66 −43.9%	95−100 +43.9%
Valorant	70−75 +43.1%	50−55 −43.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +87.5%	85−90 −87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
World of Tanks	120−130 +37.8%	90−95 −37.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40 +60%	24−27 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +48.4%	30−35 −48.4%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +45%	20−22 −45%
Metro Exodus	48 +77.8%	27−30 −77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +47.1%	16−18 −47.1%
Valorant	45−50 +43.8%	30−35 −43.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Dota 2	30 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	30 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Metro Exodus	16 +100%	8−9 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +45.9%	35−40 −45.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Dota 2	30−35 +34.8%	21−24 −34.8%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Fortnite	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Valorant	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%

This is how RX 570 and GTX 770M SLI compete in popular games:

RX 570 is 51% faster in 1080p
RX 570 is 60% faster in 1440p
RX 570 is 43% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 570 is 143% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 44% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 570 is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.13	12.79
Recency	18 April 2017	30 May 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	150 Watt

RX 570 has a 41.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 570 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.