GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon RX 570

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 570 with GeForce GTX 765M, including specs and performance data.

RX 570
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
18.12
+248%

RX 570 outperforms GTX 765M by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking308621
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.34no data
Power efficiency10.424.79
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 20GK106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed1168 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1244 MHz863 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate159.255.23
Floating-point processing power5.095 TFLOPS1.326 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI++
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 570 18.12
+248%
GTX 765M 5.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 570 6967
+248%
GTX 765M 2004

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 570 18967
+372%
GTX 765M 4019

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 570 45560
+206%
GTX 765M 14870

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 570 13827
+458%
GTX 765M 2479

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 570 71096
+304%
GTX 765M 17616

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 570 31978
+342%
GTX 765M 7240

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RX 570 40477
+503%
GTX 765M 6714

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p170−180
+233%
51
−233%
Full HD83
+113%
39
−113%
1440p48
+300%
12−14
−300%
4K30
+275%
8−9
−275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.04no data
1440p3.52no data
4K5.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Elden Ring 55−60
+338%
12−14
−338%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+344%
16−18
−344%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+241%
21−24
−241%
Metro Exodus 76
+533%
12−14
−533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Valorant 70−75
+462%
12−14
−462%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+538%
16−18
−538%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Dota 2 49
+188%
16−18
−188%
Elden Ring 55−60
+338%
12−14
−338%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+152%
24−27
−152%
Fortnite 102
+229%
30−35
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+241%
21−24
−241%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+329%
16−18
−329%
Metro Exodus 51
+325%
12−14
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+184%
40−45
−184%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+211%
18
−211%
Valorant 70−75
+462%
12−14
−462%
World of Tanks 210−220
+105%
107
−105%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 58
+263%
16−18
−263%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Dota 2 60−65
+276%
16−18
−276%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+152%
24−27
−152%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+241%
21−24
−241%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 66
+50%
40−45
−50%
Valorant 70−75
+462%
12−14
−462%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Elden Ring 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+385%
30−35
−385%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
World of Tanks 120−130
+235%
35−40
−235%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40
+400%
8−9
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+327%
10−12
−327%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Metro Exodus 48
+860%
5−6
−860%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Valorant 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Dota 2 30
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Elden Ring 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Grand Theft Auto V 30
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Metro Exodus 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+260%
14−16
−260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20
+400%
4−5
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Fortnite 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Valorant 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

This is how RX 570 and GTX 765M compete in popular games:

  • RX 570 is 233% faster in 900p
  • RX 570 is 113% faster in 1080p
  • RX 570 is 300% faster in 1440p
  • RX 570 is 275% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 570 is 1500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 570 surpassed GTX 765M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.12 5.21
Recency 18 April 2017 30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 75 Watt

RX 570 has a 247.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 765M, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 570 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8398 votes

Rate Radeon RX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 76 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.