Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RX 560

Place in performance ranking	436	75
Place by popularity	59	61
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.54	100.00
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99	$399
Current price	$381 (3.8x MSRP)	$111 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 6394% better value for money than RX 560.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	1175 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	81.60	304.8
Floating-point performance	2,611 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	170 mm	272 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560 9.44

RX 5700 XT 43.07
+356%

RX 5700 XT outperforms RX 560 by 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 560 3647

RX 5700 XT 16632
+356%

RX 5700 XT outperforms RX 560 by 356% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35 −249%	122 +249%
1440p	16−18 −363%	74 +363%
4K	10−12 −370%	47 +370%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

78
−349%

350−400

+349%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	76 −295%	300−310 +295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110 −355%	500−550 +355%
Battlefield 5	199 −352%	900−950 +352%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 −324%	500−550 +324%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 −349%	350−400 +349%
Far Cry 5	125 −340%	550−600 +340%
Far Cry New Dawn	118 −324%	500−550 +324%
Forza Horizon 4	155 −352%	700−750 +352%
Hitman 3	84 −317%	350−400 +317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	249 −342%	1100−1150 +342%
Metro Exodus	144 −351%	650−700 +351%
Red Dead Redemption 2	115 −335%	500−550 +335%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	234 −349%	1050−1100 +349%
Watch Dogs: Legion	121 −355%	550−600 +355%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70 −329%	300−310 +329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91 −340%	400−450 +340%
Battlefield 5	165 −355%	750−800 +355%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	107 −321%	450−500 +321%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 −300%	300−310 +300%
Far Cry 5	101 −346%	450−500 +346%
Far Cry New Dawn	108 −317%	450−500 +317%
Forza Horizon 4	283 −342%	1250−1300 +342%
Hitman 3	89 −349%	400−450 +349%
Horizon Zero Dawn	294 −342%	1300−1350 +342%
Metro Exodus	147 −342%	650−700 +342%
Red Dead Redemption 2	115 −335%	500−550 +335%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	193 −340%	850−900 +340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	154 −355%	700−750 +355%
Watch Dogs: Legion	248 −344%	1100−1150 +344%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 −352%	280−290 +352%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 −349%	350−400 +349%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80 −338%	350−400 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 −348%	300−310 +348%
Far Cry 5	73 −311%	300−310 +311%
Forza Horizon 4	148 −339%	650−700 +339%
Horizon Zero Dawn	135 −344%	600−650 +344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	171 −339%	750−800 +339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	93 −330%	400−450 +330%
Watch Dogs: Legion	67 −348%	300−310 +348%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

−317%

450−500
+317%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	126 −337%	550−600 +337%
Far Cry New Dawn	117 −327%	500−550 +327%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 −353%	240−250 +353%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 −341%	260−270 +341%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	78 −349%	350−400 +349%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 −350%	180−190 +350%
Far Cry 5	97 −312%	400−450 +312%
Forza Horizon 4	119 −320%	500−550 +320%
Hitman 3	59 −341%	260−270 +341%
Horizon Zero Dawn	104 −333%	450−500 +333%
Metro Exodus	104 −333%	450−500 +333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	119 −320%	500−550 +320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −346%	290−300 +346%
Watch Dogs: Legion	46 −335%	200−210 +335%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

79
−343%

350−400

+343%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	56 −346%	250−260 +346%
Far Cry New Dawn	44 −355%	200−210 +355%
Hitman 3	45 −344%	200−210 +344%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −346%	250−260 +346%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 −336%	170−180 +336%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 −344%	240−250 +344%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 −329%	150−160 +329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	33 −355%	150−160 +355%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 −355%	150−160 +355%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −341%	75−80 +341%
Far Cry 5	30 −333%	130−140 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	79 −343%	350−400 +343%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 −344%	280−290 +344%
Metro Exodus	56 −346%	250−260 +346%
Watch Dogs: Legion	13 −323%	55−60 +323%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40
−350%

180−190

+350%

This is how RX 560 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 249% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 363% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 370% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.44	43.07
Recency	18 April 2017	7 July 2019
Cost	$99	$399
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt