Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs RX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

RX 560
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.44
+49.8%

RX 560 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking436546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.543.23
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 21Polaris 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)26 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 $199
Current price$381 (3.8x MSRP)$740 (3.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 3200 has 110% better value for money than RX 560.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed1175 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate81.6041.44
Floating-point performance2,611 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560 9.44
+49.8%
Pro WX 3200 6.30

RX 560 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 560 3647
+49.9%
Pro WX 3200 2433

RX 560 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 50% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+84.2%
19
−84.2%
4K10−12
+25%
8
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+45.8%
24
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+42.9%
7
−42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+40%
15
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how RX 560 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • RX 560 is 84% faster in 1080p
  • RX 560 is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 6.30
Recency 18 April 2017 26 September 2019
Cost $99 $199
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

The Radeon RX 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2576 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 76 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.