T1000 8 GB vs Radeon RX 5500M

Place in performance ranking	345	266
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.23	6.68
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 14 / R19M-E85	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	29 September 2019 (4 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$998	$690

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500M has 38% better value for money than T1000 8 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	896
Core clock speed	1327 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	144.8	78.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 5500M and T1000 8 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500M 14.25

T1000 8 GB 19.70
+38.2%

T1000 8 GB outperforms Radeon RX 5500M by 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5500M 5502

T1000 8 GB 7607
+38.3%

T1000 8 GB outperforms Radeon RX 5500M by 38% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 −33.9%	75−80 +33.9%
1440p	51 −37.3%	70−75 +37.3%
4K	30 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−57.1%

55
+57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −43.3%	43 +43.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −40%	56 +40%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −53.3%	45−50 +53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −51.4%	53 +51.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −43.3%	43 +43.3%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −44.4%	35−40 +44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −51.1%	65−70 +51.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 −45%	58 +45%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −40%	119 +40%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −56.7%	45−50 +56.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −42.5%	57 +42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −44.3%	101 +44.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −45%	58 +45%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −48.1%	40 +48.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −44.4%	26 +44.4%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −41.7%	34 +41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −60%	48 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −57.1%	33 +57.1%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −44.4%	35−40 +44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −51.1%	65−70 +51.1%
Hitman 3	35−40 −42.9%	50 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −44%	144 +44%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −50%	36 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −51.4%	53 +51.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −49.1%	82 +49.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −44%	72 +44%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −40%	168 +40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −47.6%	31 +47.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −40%	14 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −44.4%	26 +44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −42.9%	30 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −51.1%	65−70 +51.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −44%	72 +44%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −50%	45 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −57.1%	22 +57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−54.3%

54
+54.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −54.3%	54 +54.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −48.6%	52 +48.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −42.9%	30 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −60%	48 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Hitman 3	21−24 −57.1%	33 +57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −57.1%	55 +57.1%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −56.7%	47 +56.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −38.9%	24−27 +38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −60%	16 +60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−48.1%

40
+48.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −61.1%	29 +61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −50%	15 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −38.9%	25 +38.9%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −38.9%	25 +38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−42.9%

20
+42.9%

This is how RX 5500M and T1000 8 GB compete in popular games:

T1000 8 GB is 34% faster in 1080p
T1000 8 GB is 37% faster in 1440p
T1000 8 GB is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.25	19.70
Recency	29 September 2019	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	50 Watt