Quadro 2000 vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5500 XT with Quadro 2000, including specs and performance data.

RX 5500 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
23.16
+865%

RX 5500 XT outperforms 2000 by a whopping 865% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking244846
Place by popularity88not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.570.15
Power efficiency12.512.72
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNavi 14GF106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 December 2019 (5 years ago)24 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 5500 XT has 30947% better value for money than Quadro 2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408192
Core clock speed1607 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt62 Watt
Texture fill rate162.420.00
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length180 mm178 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5500 XT 23.16
+865%
Quadro 2000 2.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 XT 9114
+863%
Quadro 2000 946

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 5500 XT 44515
+1047%
Quadro 2000 3880

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
+888%
8−9
−888%
1440p44
+1000%
4−5
−1000%
4K25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.14
+3400%
74.88
−3400%
1440p3.84
+3799%
149.75
−3799%
4K6.76
+4330%
299.50
−4330%
  • RX 5500 XT has 3400% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5500 XT has 3799% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5500 XT has 4330% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 98
+880%
10−11
−880%
Counter-Strike 2 66
+1000%
6−7
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+875%
8−9
−875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 75
+971%
7−8
−971%
Battlefield 5 74
+957%
7−8
−957%
Counter-Strike 2 50
+900%
5−6
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+917%
6−7
−917%
Far Cry 5 105
+950%
10−11
−950%
Fortnite 110−120
+1020%
10−11
−1020%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+875%
8−9
−875%
Forza Horizon 5 92
+922%
9−10
−922%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+975%
8−9
−975%
Valorant 150−160
+881%
16−18
−881%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 43
+975%
4−5
−975%
Battlefield 5 71
+914%
7−8
−914%
Counter-Strike 2 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+933%
24−27
−933%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+1025%
4−5
−1025%
Dota 2 149
+964%
14−16
−964%
Far Cry 5 96
+967%
9−10
−967%
Fortnite 110−120
+1020%
10−11
−1020%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+1000%
6−7
−1000%
Forza Horizon 5 61
+917%
6−7
−917%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+944%
9−10
−944%
Metro Exodus 52
+940%
5−6
−940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+975%
8−9
−975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+956%
9−10
−956%
Valorant 150−160
+881%
16−18
−881%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+871%
7−8
−871%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+900%
4−5
−900%
Dota 2 143
+921%
14−16
−921%
Far Cry 5 89
+889%
9−10
−889%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+1020%
5−6
−1020%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+933%
6−7
−933%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+975%
8−9
−975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+867%
6−7
−867%
Valorant 114
+1040%
10−11
−1040%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+1020%
10−11
−1020%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+888%
16−18
−888%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+1000%
4−5
−1000%
Metro Exodus 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+867%
18−20
−867%
Valorant 190−200
+989%
18−20
−989%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry 5 60
+900%
6−7
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+875%
4−5
−875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+940%
5−6
−940%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+950%
4−5
−950%
Metro Exodus 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Valorant 120−130
+975%
12−14
−975%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Counter-Strike 2 4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8 0−1
Dota 2 78
+875%
8−9
−875%
Far Cry 5 30
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

This is how RX 5500 XT and Quadro 2000 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500 XT is 888% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500 XT is 1000% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500 XT is 1150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.16 2.40
Recency 12 December 2019 24 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 62 Watt

RX 5500 XT has a 865% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 2000, on the other hand, has 109.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop card while Quadro 2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3037 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 314 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5500 XT or Quadro 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.