Arc A770M vs Radeon RX 5300

Place in performance ranking	263	96
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.24	no data
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 14	Alchemist
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2020 (4 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$558	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	512
Core clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,400 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt (120 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	144.8	422.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 5300 and Arc A770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	180 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300 19.79

Arc A770M 39.88
+102%

Arc A770M outperforms Radeon RX 5300 by 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5300 7641

Arc A770M 11699
+53.1%

Arc A770M outperforms Radeon RX 5300 by 53% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −111%	95 +111%
1440p	24−27 −125%	54 +125%
4K	16−18 −125%	36 +125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
−105%

113

+105%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −130%	65−70 +130%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −113%	120−130 +113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −103%	80−85 +103%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −111%	95 +111%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −115%	85−90 +115%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −120%	95−100 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −116%	150−160 +116%
Hitman 3	40−45 −105%	80−85 +105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −107%	176 +107%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −107%	110−120 +107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −111%	95−100 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −113%	256 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −118%	95−100 +118%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −130%	65−70 +130%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −113%	120−130 +113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −103%	80−85 +103%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −120%	77 +120%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −115%	85−90 +115%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −120%	95−100 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −116%	150−160 +116%
Hitman 3	40−45 −105%	80−85 +105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −103%	160−170 +103%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −129%	48 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −111%	95−100 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −111%	211 +111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −104%	173 +104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −118%	95−100 +118%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −133%	70−75 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −130%	65−70 +130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −103%	80−85 +103%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −123%	67 +123%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −115%	85−90 +115%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −116%	150−160 +116%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −110%	105 +110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −111%	179 +111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −113%	51 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −118%	95−100 +118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−111%

95−100
+111%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −120%	75−80 +120%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −107%	90−95 +107%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −105%	40−45 +105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −110%	40−45 +110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −103%	60−65 +103%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −110%	44 +110%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −103%	81 +103%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −110%	80−85 +110%
Hitman 3	24−27 −117%	50−55 +117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −105%	82 +105%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −111%	70−75 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −116%	95−100 +116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −115%	55−60 +115%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−130%

65−70
+130%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −113%	30−35 +113%
Hitman 3	16−18 −106%	30−35 +106%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −113%	50−55 +113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −117%	39 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −107%	62 +107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −108%	24−27 +108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −120%	22 +120%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −107%	55−60 +107%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −121%	53 +121%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −108%	50 +108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −122%	20−22 +122%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−125%

35−40
+125%

This is how RX 5300 and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

Arc A770M is 111% faster in 1080p
Arc A770M is 125% faster in 1440p
Arc A770M is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.79	39.88
Recency	28 May 2020	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt