Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs RX 480

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 480
2016
8192 MB GDDR5
22.29
+241%

RX 480 outperforms Pro WX 4150 by 241% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking232534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.750.46
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 10 EllesmerePolaris 11
GCN generation4th Genno data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 June 2016 (7 years ago)1 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$174 (0.8x MSRP)$2000

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 480 has 2454% better value for money than Pro WX 4150.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304896
Compute units36no data
Core clock speed1120 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1266 MHz1053 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate182.358.97
Floating-point performance5,834 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 480 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI2.0no data
DisplayPort support1.4HDRno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationn/ano data
CrossFire1no data
Enduron/ano data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync++
HD3Dn/ano data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudion/ano data
ZeroCore+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantlen/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 480 22.29
+241%
Pro WX 4150 6.53

RX 480 outperforms Pro WX 4150 by 241% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 480 8627
+241%
Pro WX 4150 2528

RX 480 outperforms Pro WX 4150 by 241% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD78
+271%
21−24
−271%
1440p54
+286%
14−16
−286%
4K35
+250%
10−12
−250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+346%
12−14
−346%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+248%
21−24
−248%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+205%
18−20
−205%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+269%
16−18
−269%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+355%
21−24
−355%
Hitman 3 65−70
+340%
14−16
−340%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+269%
12−14
−269%
Red Dead Redemption 2 69
+475%
12−14
−475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
+340%
14−16
−340%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+277%
12−14
−277%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+248%
21−24
−248%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+269%
16−18
−269%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+323%
21−24
−323%
Hitman 3 65−70
+340%
14−16
−340%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+269%
12−14
−269%
Metro Exodus 41
+356%
9−10
−356%
Red Dead Redemption 2 34
+183%
12−14
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+280%
14−16
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
+500%
12−14
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+169%
12−14
−169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+248%
21−24
−248%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Far Cry New Dawn 69
+331%
16−18
−331%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+250%
21−24
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+238%
12−14
−238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Hitman 3 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
+525%
8−9
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Hitman 3 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Metro Exodus 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+800%
3−4
−800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

This is how RX 480 and Pro WX 4150 compete in popular games:

  • RX 480 is 271% faster than Pro WX 4150 in 1080p
  • RX 480 is 286% faster than Pro WX 4150 in 1440p
  • RX 480 is 250% faster than Pro WX 4150 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 480 is 2000% faster than the Pro WX 4150.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 480 surpassed Pro WX 4150 in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.29 6.53
Recency 29 June 2016 1 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

The Radeon RX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 480 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1590 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.