Radeon 780M vs RX 470 Mobile

Place in the ranking	309	308
Place by popularity	not in top-100	61
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.11	no data
Power efficiency	14.75	83.76
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	Hawx Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	768
Core clock speed	926 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1074 MHz	2700 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	137.5	129.6
Floating-point processing power	4.399 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 Mobile 17.75

Radeon 780M 17.79
+0.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 470 Mobile 10715
+34.2%

Radeon 780M 7987

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −16.7%	35 +16.7%
1440p	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
4K	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	18.33	no data
1440p	34.37	no data
4K	45.83	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	32 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −8.3%	39 +8.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +23.1%	26 −23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +140%	15 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +16.9%	65 −16.9%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +11.4%	44 −11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +28%	25 −28%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +200%	12 −200%
Dota 2	65−70 +124%	29 −124%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +93.8%	32 −93.8%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +40.7%	54 −40.7%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +44.4%	45 −44.4%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +53.1%	32 −53.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
World of Tanks	210−220 −0.5%	220−230 +0.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +200%	12 −200%
Dota 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +65.2%	46 −65.2%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 +55.6%	18 −55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +52.6%	19 −52.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −0.6%	160−170 +0.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
World of Tanks	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +43.8%	32 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +25%	20 −25%
Valorant	45−50 −2.2%	45−50 +2.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +47.6%	21 −47.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +47.6%	21 −47.6%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +47.6%	21 −47.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Fortnite	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +58.8%	17 −58.8%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how RX 470 Mobile and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

Radeon 780M is 17% faster in 1080p
Radeon 780M is 6% faster in 1440p
Radeon 780M is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 200% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 780M is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 21 test (33%)
Radeon 780M is ahead in 7 tests (11%)
there's a draw in 35 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.75	17.79
Recency	4 August 2016	6 December 2023
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 0.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 470 Mobile and Radeon 780M.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.