GeForce GTX 970M vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile and GeForce GTX 970M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 470 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 85 Watt
18.23
+22.8%

RX 470 Mobile outperforms GTX 970M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking306355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.15no data
Power efficiency14.7612.62
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameEllesmereGM204
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)7 October 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 $2,560.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 470 Mobile and GTX 970M have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed926 MHz924 MHz
Boost clock speed1074 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate137.583.04
Floating-point processing power4.399 TFLOPS2.657 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs12880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s120 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display supportno data+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno data+
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
BatteryBoost-+
Ansel-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 Mobile 18.23
+22.8%
GTX 970M 14.85

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 470 Mobile 10715
+43.6%
GTX 970M 7463

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p160−170
+17.6%
136
−17.6%
Full HD65−70
+16.1%
56
−16.1%
1440p30−35
+20%
25
−20%
4K27−30
+22.7%
22
−22.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.46
+440%
45.73
−440%
1440p18.33
+459%
102.44
−459%
4K20.37
+471%
116.40
−471%
  • RX 470 Mobile has 440% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 470 Mobile has 459% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 470 Mobile has 471% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Elden Ring 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+26.1%
46
−26.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+19.5%
41
−19.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
Valorant 70−75
+25.4%
55−60
−25.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+26.1%
46
−26.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Dota 2 65−70
+97%
33
−97%
Elden Ring 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Fortnite 95−100
+66.1%
59
−66.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+32.7%
49
−32.7%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+69%
29
−69%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−19.2%
149
+19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+29.5%
44
−29.5%
Valorant 70−75
+25.4%
55−60
−25.4%
World of Tanks 220−230
+14%
190−200
−14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+45%
40
−45%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Dota 2 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+229%
38
−229%
Valorant 70−75
+25.4%
55−60
−25.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Elden Ring 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+25%
130−140
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
World of Tanks 120−130
+20.2%
100−110
−20.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+37%
27
−37%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+27.8%
35−40
−27.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+64%
25
−64%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Valorant 45−50
+24.3%
35−40
−24.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Dota 2 30−35
−6.5%
33
+6.5%
Elden Ring 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−6.5%
33
+6.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+85.7%
7
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+42.1%
38
−42.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−6.5%
33
+6.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+38.5%
13
−38.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Fortnite 21−24
+40%
15
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Valorant 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

This is how RX 470 Mobile and GTX 970M compete in popular games:

  • RX 470 Mobile is 18% faster in 900p
  • RX 470 Mobile is 16% faster in 1080p
  • RX 470 Mobile is 20% faster in 1440p
  • RX 470 Mobile is 23% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 229% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 970M is 19% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (94%)
  • GTX 970M is ahead in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.23 14.85
Recency 4 August 2016 7 October 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX 470 Mobile has a 22.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 970M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 314 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.