FirePro W5100 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with FirePro W5100, including specs and performance data.
470 Mobile outperforms W5100 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 360 | 582 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.62 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.83 | 11.07 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | Bonaire |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (9 years ago) | 31 March 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1074 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 44.64 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.399 TFLOPS | 1.428 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 16 |
| TMUs | 128 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 171 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / half length |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| StereoOutput3D | - | + |
| DisplayPort count | no data | 4 |
| Dual-link DVI support | - | + |
| HD сomponent video output | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+135%
|
40−45
−135%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+150%
|
14−16
−150%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+137%
|
30−33
−137%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+135%
|
40−45
−135%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+150%
|
14−16
−150%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 65−70
+152%
|
27−30
−152%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+129%
|
24−27
−129%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+160%
|
35−40
−160%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+130%
|
30−33
−130%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+130%
|
27−30
−130%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+140%
|
55−60
−140%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+137%
|
30−33
−137%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+135%
|
40−45
−135%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+138%
|
90−95
−138%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+150%
|
14−16
−150%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+153%
|
40−45
−153%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 65−70
+152%
|
27−30
−152%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+129%
|
24−27
−129%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+160%
|
35−40
−160%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+130%
|
30−33
−130%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+148%
|
21−24
−148%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60−65
+133%
|
27−30
−133%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+150%
|
14−16
−150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+130%
|
27−30
−130%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+150%
|
18−20
−150%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+140%
|
55−60
−140%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+137%
|
30−33
−137%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+150%
|
14−16
−150%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+153%
|
40−45
−153%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 65−70
+152%
|
27−30
−152%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+129%
|
24−27
−129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+130%
|
30−33
−130%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+130%
|
27−30
−130%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+150%
|
18−20
−150%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+140%
|
55−60
−140%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 90−95
+160%
|
35−40
−160%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+136%
|
14−16
−136%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+146%
|
50−55
−146%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+133%
|
12−14
−133%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+133%
|
9−10
−133%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+145%
|
65−70
−145%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+134%
|
70−75
−134%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+161%
|
18−20
−161%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40
+150%
|
14−16
−150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+131%
|
16−18
−131%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+128%
|
18−20
−128%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+150%
|
10−11
−150%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+138%
|
16−18
−138%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+158%
|
12−14
−158%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+140%
|
10−11
−140%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+133%
|
40−45
−133%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+150%
|
10−11
−150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| Dota 2 | 55−60
+146%
|
24−27
−146%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+157%
|
7−8
−157%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.19 | 7.11 |
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 31 March 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 50 Watt |
RX 470 Mobile has a 127.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
FirePro W5100, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W5100 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
