Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RX 460
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.77

AI PRO R9700 outperforms RX 460 by a whopping 629% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.12no data
Power efficiency9.9318.09
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBaffinNavi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2016 (9 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8964096
Core clock speed1090 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate67.20747.5
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs56256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 460 9.77
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+629%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 460 4093
AI PRO R9700 29830
+629%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−607%
290−300
+607%
1440p50
−600%
350−400
+600%
4K20
−600%
140−150
+600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.10no data
1440p1.72no data
4K4.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−560%
350−400
+560%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−582%
300−310
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−560%
350−400
+560%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Far Cry 5 40
−625%
290−300
+625%
Fortnite 116
−590%
800−850
+590%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−602%
400−450
+602%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
−622%
260−270
+622%
Valorant 90−95
−591%
650−700
+591%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−582%
300−310
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−560%
350−400
+560%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−605%
1050−1100
+605%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Dota 2 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%
Far Cry 5 37
−603%
260−270
+603%
Fortnite 39
−618%
280−290
+618%
Forza Horizon 4 54
−548%
350−400
+548%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−614%
250−260
+614%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
Metro Exodus 21
−614%
150−160
+614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28
−614%
200−210
+614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−603%
260−270
+603%
Valorant 90−95
−591%
650−700
+591%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−582%
300−310
+582%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Dota 2 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%
Far Cry 5 34
−606%
240−250
+606%
Forza Horizon 4 41
−607%
290−300
+607%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20
−600%
140−150
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−596%
160−170
+596%
Valorant 90−95
−591%
650−700
+591%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 31
−610%
220−230
+610%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−624%
550−600
+624%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−586%
350−400
+586%
Valorant 100−110
−588%
750−800
+588%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−620%
180−190
+620%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−608%
170−180
+608%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−608%
85−90
+608%
Valorant 50−55
−573%
350−400
+573%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Dota 2 35−40
−622%
260−270
+622%
Far Cry 5 11
−627%
80−85
+627%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%

This is how RX 460 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 607% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 600% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.77 71.19
Recency 8 August 2016 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

RX 460 has 300% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 628.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1119 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 460 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.