RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon R9 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 Nano with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

R9 Nano
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 175 Watt
21.33

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms R9 Nano by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.614.81
Power efficiency8.678.46
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameFijiGB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date27 August 2015 (9 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 4% better value for money than R9 Nano.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409624064
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate256.01,968
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs256752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length152 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR7
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 Nano 21.33
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+235%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 Nano 8486
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+235%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
−230%
300−350
+230%
4K46
−226%
150−160
+226%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.13
+300%
28.55
−300%
4K14.11
+305%
57.10
−305%
  • R9 Nano has 300% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 Nano has 305% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−194%
350−400
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Dead Island 2 85−90
−229%
280−290
+229%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−229%
280−290
+229%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−194%
350−400
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Dead Island 2 85−90
−229%
280−290
+229%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−224%
220−230
+224%
Fortnite 100−110
−227%
350−400
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−233%
280−290
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−223%
210−220
+223%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−229%
260−270
+229%
Valorant 150−160
−231%
500−550
+231%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−229%
280−290
+229%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−194%
350−400
+194%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−232%
800−850
+232%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Dead Island 2 85−90
−229%
280−290
+229%
Dota 2 110−120
−210%
350−400
+210%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−224%
220−230
+224%
Fortnite 100−110
−227%
350−400
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−233%
280−290
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−223%
210−220
+223%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−225%
250−260
+225%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−229%
260−270
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−222%
190−200
+222%
Valorant 150−160
−231%
500−550
+231%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−229%
280−290
+229%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Dead Island 2 85−90
−229%
280−290
+229%
Dota 2 110−120
−210%
350−400
+210%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−224%
220−230
+224%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−233%
280−290
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−229%
260−270
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−219%
150−160
+219%
Valorant 150−160
−231%
500−550
+231%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−227%
350−400
+227%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−202%
450−500
+202%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−218%
550−600
+218%
Valorant 180−190
−217%
600−650
+217%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−228%
190−200
+228%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Dead Island 2 35−40
−224%
120−130
+224%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−227%
170−180
+227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Dead Island 2 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−216%
120−130
+216%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−214%
110−120
+214%
Valorant 110−120
−194%
350−400
+194%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Dead Island 2 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Dota 2 70−75
−229%
230−240
+229%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−226%
75−80
+226%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%

This is how R9 Nano and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 230% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 226% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.33 71.35
Recency 27 August 2015 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 600 Watt

R9 Nano has 242.9% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 234.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Nano in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Nano is a desktop card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 92 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Nano or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.