GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470X

Place in the ranking	503	558
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Emerald	N14P-GT
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	768
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	967 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,080 million	1300 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	61.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.971 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	56	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

60−65
+13.2%

−13.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Elden Ring	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +22.7%	21−24 −22.7%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +21.4%	27−30 −21.4%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Valorant	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +22.7%	21−24 −22.7%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Dota 2	30−33 +25%	24−27 −25%
Elden Ring	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Fortnite	50−55 +22%	40−45 −22%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +21.4%	27−30 −21.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 +25%	24−27 −25%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 +19.6%	55−60 −19.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Valorant	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
World of Tanks	120−130 −29.4%	163 +29.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +22.7%	21−24 −22.7%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Dota 2	30−33 +25%	24−27 −25%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +21.4%	27−30 −21.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 +19.6%	55−60 −19.6%
Valorant	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Elden Ring	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +7.7%	35−40 −7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
World of Tanks	60−65 +22%	50−55 −22%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Valorant	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Elden Ring	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +11.8%	16−18 −11.8%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +11.8%	16−18 −11.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Fortnite	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Valorant	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

This is how R9 M470X and GT 750M SLI compete in popular games:

R9 M470X is 13% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M470X is 100% faster.
in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 750M SLI is 29% faster.

All in all, in popular games: