Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Radeon R9 M395X
Aggregated performance score
R9 M395X
2014
4096 MB GDDR5
13.41
GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3072 MB GDDR5
14.34
+6.9%
GeForce GTX 770M SLI outperforms Radeon R9 M395X by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 353 | 334 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | no data | 20.93 |
| Architecture | GCN 3 (2014−2016) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | Amethyst XT | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2014 (9 years old) | 30 May 2013 (10 years old) |
| Current price | no data | $149 |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 811 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 2x 2540 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | no data |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R9 M395X and GeForce GTX 770M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
| SLI options | no data | + |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
| Eyefinity | 1 | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | - | no data |
| Enduro | - | no data |
| FreeSync | 1 | no data |
| HD3D | + | no data |
| PowerTune | + | no data |
| DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
| TrueAudio | + | no data |
| ZeroCore | + | no data |
| Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
| Optimus | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | no data |
| Mantle | + | no data |
| CUDA | no data | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−6.5%
|
45−50
+6.5%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
−5.7%
|
35−40
+5.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−5.7%
|
35−40
+5.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
−5.4%
|
35−40
+5.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
−8.5%
|
50−55
+8.5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
−8.3%
|
35−40
+8.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
−4.3%
|
24−27
+4.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−6.5%
|
45−50
+6.5%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
−5.7%
|
35−40
+5.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−5.7%
|
35−40
+5.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
−5.4%
|
35−40
+5.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
−8.5%
|
50−55
+8.5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
−8.3%
|
35−40
+8.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
−4.3%
|
24−27
+4.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−6.5%
|
45−50
+6.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−5.7%
|
35−40
+5.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
−5.4%
|
35−40
+5.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
−8.5%
|
50−55
+8.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−7.1%
|
30−33
+7.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20−22
+5.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−11.1%
|
30−33
+11.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−7.7%
|
27−30
+7.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−11.1%
|
20−22
+11.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 16.7% faster than the R9 M395X.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 61 test (90%)
- there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 13.41 | 14.34 |
| Recency | 16 October 2014 | 30 May 2013 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M395X and GeForce GTX 770M SLI.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
