Radeon Pro 5300 vs R9 M395

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 M395
2015
4 GB GDDR5
12.99

Pro 5300 outperforms R9 M395 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking363281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.048.38
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 June 2015 (8 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$1288 $1300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5300 has 311% better value for money than R9 M395.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921280
Core clock speed834 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data132.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M395 and Radeon Pro 5300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395 12.99
Pro 5300 18.48
+42.3%

Pro 5300 outperforms R9 M395 by 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M395 5023
Pro 5300 7143
+42.2%

Pro 5300 outperforms R9 M395 by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Hitman 3 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Hitman 3 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.99 18.48
Recency 9 June 2015 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Radeon Pro 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395 is a notebook card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 80 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.