Radeon Pro 5300 vs R9 M395X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395X with Radeon Pro 5300, including specs and performance data.

R9 M395X
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
13.51

Pro 5300 outperforms R9 M395X by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking381299
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.4315.08
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameAmethystNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed723 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54132.0
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS4.224 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395X 13.51
Pro 5300 18.58
+37.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M395X 5194
Pro 5300 7143
+37.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Elden Ring 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Valorant 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Dota 2 45−50
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Elden Ring 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Fortnite 75−80
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−35.4%
65−70
+35.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−31.3%
130−140
+31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Valorant 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
World of Tanks 180−190
−33.3%
240−250
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Dota 2 45−50
−32.7%
65−70
+32.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−31.3%
130−140
+31.3%
Valorant 50−55
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Elden Ring 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−34.6%
140−150
+34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
World of Tanks 95−100
−36.8%
130−140
+36.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Valorant 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Dota 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Elden Ring 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Fortnite 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Valorant 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.51 18.58
Recency 5 May 2015 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 5300 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 194.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395X is a notebook card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.