GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon R9 M395

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R9 M395
2015
4096 MB GDDR5
12.97
+5.6%

Radeon R9 M395 outperforms GeForce GTX 860M SLI by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking360370
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.984.66
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Maxwell (2014−2018)
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 June 2015 (8 years old)12 March 2014 (10 years old)
Current price$1288 $489

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 860M SLI has 135% better value for money than R9 M395.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921280
Core clock speed834 MHz1029 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million2x 1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
SLI optionsno data+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz5000 MHz
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Eyefinity1no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Vulkan+no data
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395 12.97
+5.6%
GTX 860M SLI 12.28

Radeon R9 M395 outperforms GeForce GTX 860M SLI by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M395 8656
GTX 860M SLI 9840
+13.7%

GeForce GTX 860M SLI outperforms Radeon R9 M395 by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M395 6819
+14.8%
GTX 860M SLI 5941

Radeon R9 M395 outperforms GeForce GTX 860M SLI by 15% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M395 38490
GTX 860M SLI 41434
+7.6%

GeForce GTX 860M SLI outperforms Radeon R9 M395 by 8% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−2.2%
46
+2.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.5%
40−45
−4.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.5%
40−45
−4.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.5%
40−45
−4.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hitman 3 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how R9 M395 and GTX 860M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 860M SLI is 2.2% faster than R9 M395 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M395 is 25% faster than the GTX 860M SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M395 is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 12.97 12.28
Recency 9 June 2015 12 March 2014

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
GeForce GTX 860M SLI

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.