AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparison of Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
40.6 GTexel / s
32.02 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
28.8 GB / s
48.0 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
R9 M375 3.50
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
R9 M375 8466
K2100M 11835 +39.8%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
R9 M375 1514
K2100M 1553 +2.6%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
R9 M375 1667 +3.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
R9 M375 3314 +38.4%
3DMark Vantage Performance
R9 M375 8275
K2100M 10648 +28.7%
R9 M375 1239
K2100M 1330 +7.3%
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
143 Mh/s +276.3%
38 Mh/s −276.3%
Let's see how good Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M375
Much newer (5 May 2015 vs 23 July 2013)
More pipelines (640 vs 576)
DirectX 12 (FL 11_1)
Mantle (an API developed by AMD for 3D graphics acceleration. Discontinued and later superceded by Vulkan)
OpenGL 4.3 (Open Graphics Library - an API for 3D graphics and GPUs usage)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
PowerTune (dynamically increases AMD GPU's voltage and frequency while there's still enough temperature headroom. Similar to NVIDIA GPU Boost)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Eyefinity (allows using several displays with an AMD GPU)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Higher memory bandwidth (48 vs 28.8 GB/s)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, R9 M375 or Quadro K2100M?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Be aware that Radeon R9 M375 is a notebook card while Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon R9 M375 and Quadro K2100M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.