GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Radeon R9 M295X

Place in performance ranking	356	362
Place by popularity	38	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 3 (2014−2016)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Tonga	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	16 October 2014 (9 years ago)	April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	768
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1366 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	92.54	no data
Floating-point performance	2,961 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M295X and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	Not Listed	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	0 MB	3 MB
Memory bus width	Not Listed	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	84 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
Multi-Projection	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	Not Listed	no data
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	Not Listed	no data
Vulkan	no data	+
Mantle	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M295X 13.30
+4.1%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.78

Radeon R9 M295X outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M295X 6591
+3%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Radeon R9 M295X outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 3% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	48 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
4K	31 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+16.7%

18−20

−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Hitman 3	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Hitman 3	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Hitman 3	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%