GeForce 7000M vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and GeForce 7000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M290X Crossfire
2014
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
19.08
+63500%

R9 M290X Crossfire outperforms 7000M by a whopping 63500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2941485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.58no data
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)no data
GPU code nameNeptune CFC67
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2014 (10 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603
Core clock speed850 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2800 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GBno data
Memory bus width2x 256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4800 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)shared Memory

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Elden Ring 60−65 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Valorant 75−80 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Dota 2 65−70 0−1
Elden Ring 60−65 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Fortnite 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 0−1
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+3150%
4−5
−3150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Valorant 75−80 0−1
World of Tanks 220−230
+2725%
8−9
−2725%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Dota 2 65−70 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+3150%
4−5
−3150%
Valorant 75−80 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−33 0−1
Elden Ring 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 130−140 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Metro Exodus 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Valorant 45−50
+1125%
4−5
−1125%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Elden Ring 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the R9 M290X Crossfire is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M290X Crossfire surpassed GeForce 7000M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.08 0.03
Recency 1 March 2014 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm

R9 M290X Crossfire has a 63500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.