RTX A4500 Mobile vs Quadro M5000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000M and RTX A4500 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

M5000M
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
17.51

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms M5000M by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30877
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.5422.15
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM204GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,5365888
Core clock speed975 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1051 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate93.60276.0
Floating-point processing power2.995 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs96184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.28.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M5000M 17.51
RTX A4500 Mobile 43.31
+147%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M5000M 6999
RTX A4500 Mobile 17309
+147%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
−144%
210−220
+144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−172%
95−100
+172%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−91.4%
110−120
+91.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−172%
95−100
+172%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−197%
220−230
+197%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−133%
110−120
+133%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−112%
100−110
+112%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−100%
85−90
+100%
Valorant 70−75
−147%
180−190
+147%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−91.4%
110−120
+91.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−172%
95−100
+172%
Dota 2 65−70
−106%
130−140
+106%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−63.5%
100−110
+63.5%
Fortnite 95−100
−91.8%
180−190
+91.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−197%
220−230
+197%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−133%
110−120
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−106%
130−140
+106%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−112%
100−110
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−68%
210−220
+68%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−100%
85−90
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−188%
160−170
+188%
Valorant 70−75
−147%
180−190
+147%
World of Tanks 210−220
−27.4%
270−280
+27.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−91.4%
110−120
+91.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−172%
95−100
+172%
Dota 2 65−70
−106%
130−140
+106%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−63.5%
100−110
+63.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−197%
220−230
+197%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−133%
110−120
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−68%
210−220
+68%
Valorant 70−75
−147%
180−190
+147%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
−204%
85−90
+204%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−6.1%
170−180
+6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−194%
45−50
+194%
World of Tanks 120−130
−129%
280−290
+129%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−114%
75−80
+114%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−250%
45−50
+250%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−206%
140−150
+206%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−193%
130−140
+193%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−162%
75−80
+162%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−232%
80−85
+232%
Valorant 45−50
−226%
150−160
+226%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Dota 2 30−35
−200%
90−95
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−200%
90−95
+200%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−178%
150−160
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−200%
90−95
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−200%
50−55
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Dota 2 30−35
−200%
90−95
+200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−209%
70−75
+209%
Fortnite 21−24
−224%
65−70
+224%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−185%
75−80
+185%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Valorant 21−24
−286%
80−85
+286%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how M5000M and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 144% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 340% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.51 43.31
Recency 18 August 2015 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 140 Watt

M5000M has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 147.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 139 votes

Rate Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.