Radeon R9 270 vs R9 Fury

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 Fury
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
24.84
+123%

R9 Fury outperforms R9 270 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking201391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.622.11
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2015−2016)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameFijiCuracao
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date16 June 2015 (9 years ago)13 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $179
Current price$44 (0.1x MSRP)$229 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 Fury has 309% better value for money than R9 270.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841280
Compute units56no data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate224.074.00
Floating-point performance7,168 gflops2,368 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pin1 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+1
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire11
Enduro--
FRTC1no data
FreeSync11
HD3D++
LiquidVR11
PowerTune+-
TressFX11
TrueAudio++
ZeroCore--
UVD++
VCE+no data
DDMA audio++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan++
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 Fury 24.84
+123%
R9 270 11.15

R9 Fury outperforms R9 270 by 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 Fury 9592
+123%
R9 270 4306

R9 Fury outperforms R9 270 by 123% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 Fury 14580
+146%
R9 270 5930

R9 Fury outperforms R9 270 by 146% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

R9 Fury 1691
+138%
R9 270 711

R9 Fury outperforms R9 270 by 138% in Unigine Heaven 4.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD92
+130%
40−45
−130%
1440p106
+136%
45−50
−136%
4K47
+124%
21−24
−124%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+141%
27−30
−141%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%
Hitman 3 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+145%
40−45
−145%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+133%
30−33
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Battlefield 5 51
+143%
21−24
−143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+141%
27−30
−141%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%
Hitman 3 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+145%
40−45
−145%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+128%
40−45
−128%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+133%
30−33
−133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+142%
12−14
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+145%
40−45
−145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+156%
18−20
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+133%
30−33
−133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Hitman 3 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Hitman 3 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+125%
16−18
−125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%

This is how R9 Fury and R9 270 compete in popular games:

  • R9 Fury is 130% faster in 1080p
  • R9 Fury is 136% faster in 1440p
  • R9 Fury is 124% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.84 11.15
Recency 16 June 2015 13 November 2013
Cost $549 $179
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 150 Watt

The Radeon R9 Fury is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
AMD Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 163 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 565 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.