GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Radeon R9 Fury

Place in the ranking	224	394
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.04	no data
Power efficiency	6.21	5.86
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Fiji	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 July 2015 (9 years ago)	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	1920
Compute units	56	no data
Core clock speed	no data	811 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	8,900 million	2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	275 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.0	no data
Floating-point processing power	7.168 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	224	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	-	+
Bridgeless CrossFire	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)	GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)	+	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 3 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	2x 192 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	-
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
LiquidVR	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data
Optimus	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	11
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	+	-
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 Fury 24.85
+94.4%

GTX 770M SLI 12.78

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 Fury 17543
+83.3%

GTX 770M SLI 9569

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	89 +97.8%	45−50 −97.8%
1440p	97 +116%	45−50 −116%
4K	49 +104%	24−27 −104%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.17	no data
1440p	5.66	no data
4K	11.20	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +109%	21−24 −109%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +104%	24−27 −104%
Elden Ring	80−85 +108%	35−40 −108%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +81%	40−45 −81%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +109%	21−24 −109%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +104%	24−27 −104%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +110%	50−55 −110%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +68.8%	30−35 −68.8%
Valorant	100−105 +96.1%	50−55 −96.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +81%	40−45 −81%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +109%	21−24 −109%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +104%	24−27 −104%
Dota 2	85−90 +87%	45−50 −87%
Elden Ring	80−85 +108%	35−40 −108%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +57.1%	45−50 −57.1%
Fortnite	120−130 +71.2%	70−75 −71.2%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +110%	50−55 −110%
Grand Theft Auto V	85−90 +84.8%	45−50 −84.8%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +64.2%	95−100 −64.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +68.8%	30−35 −68.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +94.9%	35−40 −94.9%
Valorant	100−105 +96.1%	50−55 −96.1%
World of Tanks	268 +54.9%	170−180 −54.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +81%	40−45 −81%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +109%	21−24 −109%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +104%	24−27 −104%
Dota 2	130 +183%	45−50 −183%
Far Cry 5	101 +106%	45−50 −106%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +110%	50−55 −110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +64.2%	95−100 −64.2%
Valorant	100−105 +96.1%	50−55 −96.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Elden Ring	40−45 +132%	18−20 −132%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +101%	85−90 −101%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
World of Tanks	158 +75.6%	90−95 −75.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +100%	24−27 −100%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +140%	30−33 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +113%	30−35 −113%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +111%	27−30 −111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +118%	16−18 −118%
Valorant	65−70 +109%	30−35 −109%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +175%	8−9 −175%
Dota 2	47 +104%	21−24 −104%
Elden Ring	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Grand Theft Auto V	47 +104%	21−24 −104%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +105%	35−40 −105%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +104%	21−24 −104%
World of Tanks	109 +98.2%	55−60 −98.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +175%	8−9 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Dota 2	102 +343%	21−24 −343%
Far Cry 5	38 +138%	16−18 −138%
Fortnite	35 +150%	14−16 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +111%	18−20 −111%
Valorant	30−35 +146%	12−14 −146%