GeForce 7900 GT vs Radeon R9 FURY X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 FURY X
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
25.89
+3764%

Radeon R9 FURY X outperforms GeForce 7900 GT by a whopping 3764% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1931144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameFijiG71
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 June 2015 (8 years ago)9 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$350 (0.5x MSRP)$241

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 FURY X and 7900 GT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate268.810.80
Floating-point performance8,602 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length191 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR3
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1320 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s42.24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity1no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 FURY X 25.89
+3764%
7900 GT 0.67

Radeon R9 FURY X outperforms GeForce 7900 GT by 3764% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 FURY X 10010
+3780%
7900 GT 258

Radeon R9 FURY X outperforms GeForce 7900 GT by 3780% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.89 0.67
Recency 24 June 2015 9 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 48 Watt

The Radeon R9 FURY X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
GeForce 7900 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 78 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 41 vote

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.