Radeon 780M vs R9 390X

Place in the ranking	229	304
Place by popularity	not in top-100	48
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.13	no data
Power efficiency	6.14	84.13
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Grenada	Hawx Point
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	18 June 2015 (9 years ago)	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$429	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2816	768
Core clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	2700 MHz
Number of transistors	6,200 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	275 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	184.8	129.6
Floating-point processing power	5.914 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	176	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	275 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin	None
Bridgeless CrossFire	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
High bandwidth memory (HBM)	-	no data
Maximum RAM amount	0 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	512 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1050 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	-
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
VCE	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390X 24.47
+33.8%

Radeon 780M 18.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X 9408
+33.8%

Radeon 780M 7032

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 390X 17944
+40.4%

Radeon 780M 12785

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 390X 35807

Radeon 780M 41622
+16.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 390X 12389
+55.1%

Radeon 780M 7987

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 390X 74351
+54.5%

Radeon 780M 48112

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 390X 318024

Radeon 780M 429810
+35.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90 +157%	35 −157%
1440p	21−24 +23.5%	17 −23.5%
4K	51 +264%	14 −264%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.77	no data
1440p	20.43	no data
4K	8.41	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +40.6%	32 −40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +28.2%	39 −28.2%
Elden Ring	80−85 +116%	37 −116%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +73.1%	26 −73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +233%	15 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +64.6%	65 −64.6%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +45.5%	44 −45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +25.6%	40−45 −25.6%
Valorant	95−100 +32.4%	70−75 −32.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +80%	25 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +317%	12 −317%
Dota 2	80−85 +190%	29 −190%
Elden Ring	80−85 +90.5%	42 −90.5%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +138%	32 −138%
Fortnite	120−130 +24.2%	95−100 −24.2%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +98.1%	54 −98.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	80−85 +86.7%	45 −86.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +100%	32 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +23%	120−130 −23%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +25.6%	40−45 −25.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	78 +36.8%	55−60 −36.8%
Valorant	95−100 +32.4%	70−75 −32.4%
World of Tanks	250−260 +16.4%	220−230 −16.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +40.6%	30−35 −40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +317%	12 −317%
Dota 2	80−85 +29.2%	65−70 −29.2%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +20.6%	60−65 −20.6%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +133%	46 −133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +23%	120−130 −23%
Valorant	95−100 +32.4%	70−75 −32.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 +128%	18 −128%
Elden Ring	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +116%	19 −116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +5.4%	160−170 −5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
World of Tanks	160−170 +29.6%	120−130 −29.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +32.4%	35−40 −32.4%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +47.9%	45−50 −47.9%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +103%	32 −103%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +36.6%	40−45 −36.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +80%	20 −80%
Valorant	65−70 +40.4%	45−50 −40.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Dota 2	40−45 +100%	21 −100%
Elden Ring	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +100%	21 −100%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +36.4%	55−60 −36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +100%	21 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Dota 2	40−45 +35.5%	30−35 −35.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +39.1%	21−24 −39.1%
Fortnite	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +118%	17 −118%
Valorant	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%