Arc B580 vs Radeon R9 390X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390X and Arc B580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
23.51

Arc B580 outperforms R9 390X by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking234107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.7592.85
Power efficiency6.1414.64
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Xe2 (2025)
GPU code nameGrenadaBMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B580 has 852% better value for money than R9 390X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28162560
Core clock speedno data2670 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate184.8427.2
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs176160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length275 mm272 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB12 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390X 23.51
Arc B580 38.77
+64.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X 9414
Arc B580 15526
+64.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
−38.9%
125
+38.9%
1440p40−45
−75%
70
+75%
4K51
+21.4%
42
−21.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.77
−139%
1.99
+139%
1440p10.73
−202%
3.56
+202%
4K8.41
−41.9%
5.93
+41.9%
  • Arc B580 has 139% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc B580 has 202% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc B580 has 42% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−218%
143
+218%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−41.3%
100−110
+41.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−160%
117
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−58.9%
170−180
+58.9%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−58.5%
100−110
+58.5%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−50%
95−100
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−46.3%
75−80
+46.3%
Valorant 95−100
−65.3%
160−170
+65.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−41.3%
100−110
+41.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−131%
104
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%
Dota 2 85−90
−64.7%
140
+64.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+8.7%
69
−8.7%
Fortnite 120−130
−42.3%
170−180
+42.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−58.9%
170−180
+58.9%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−58.5%
100−110
+58.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−54.8%
130−140
+54.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+77.8%
36
−77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−31%
200−210
+31%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−46.3%
75−80
+46.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
−84.6%
140−150
+84.6%
Valorant 95−100
−65.3%
160−170
+65.3%
World of Tanks 250−260
−9.4%
270−280
+9.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−41.3%
100−110
+41.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−111%
95
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%
Dota 2 85−90
−64.7%
140−150
+64.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−32%
95−100
+32%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−58.9%
170−180
+58.9%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−58.5%
100−110
+58.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−31%
200−210
+31%
Valorant 95−100
−65.3%
160−170
+65.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%
Dota 2 40−45
−68.3%
69
+68.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−60%
280−290
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
World of Tanks 160−170
−58%
250−260
+58%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−51%
70−75
+51%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−83.1%
130−140
+83.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−71.8%
65−70
+71.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−55.4%
85−90
+55.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Valorant 65−70
−93.9%
120−130
+93.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Dota 2 40−45
−85.7%
78
+85.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−142%
46
+142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−74.7%
130−140
+74.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−88%
45−50
+88%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Fortnite 30−33
−93.3%
55−60
+93.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−81%
35−40
+81%
Valorant 30−35
−113%
65−70
+113%

This is how R9 390X and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 39% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 75% faster in 1440p
  • R9 390X is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 390X is 78% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B580 is 218% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 390X is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • Arc B580 is ahead in 43 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.51 38.77
Recency 18 June 2015 16 January 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 190 Watt

Arc B580 has a 64.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 44.7% lower power consumption.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 390X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 267 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 458 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390X or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.